• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Québec has language laws that prevent businesses from using English in their advertising among other things, and some controversial rulings have come from it. One such ruling was the use of “le week-end”. Québec was punishing businesses who used this term instead of “la fin de semaine”. There was an interview done with an official from the language police where the interviewer had a dictionary from France which showed “le week-end” is proper French. The Québec official said “France doesn’t decide what words are French. We do.”

      • pseudo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Il y en a deux ! Une pour la France et une pour le Québec mais la majorité des locuteurs du français sont en Afrique.

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I tried searching for it before posting but couldn’t find it. It was a radio interview likely sometime in the 80s. It’s hard to find because a search for controversial things the Québec language police have done turns up a lot of results.

      • Klnsfw 🏳️‍🌈@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh please. There isn’t a single linguist in the Académie Française.

        The Académie Française is to the French language what a group of former weathermen is to climatology.

        • Evkob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Honnêtement, tu donnes un peu trop de crédibilité à l’Académie française dans ta comparaison.

      • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Can we take a sidebar over here, and recognize how VIOLENTLY (possibly literally) English speakers would reject that sort of sometimes-it’s-actually-legally-binding official language board?

        Even those Karen type motherfuckers, who will openly yell at people at McDonald’s for speaking some non-English language would FULLY reject any ivory-tower shithead telling THEM exactly how to speak English.

        I mean, they would be the FIRST people to to reject that shit, and they would reject it the most forcefully. And they would be entirely correct, for once. The duty of dictionary compilers, linguists, and everyone else in that general field is to RECORD the evolution of languages. It is never their duty to PRESCRIBE usage.

        That is, and I’m choosing my words very carefully here, SOME NAZI SHIT. It’s authoritarian nonsense. It’s never okay. For any reason. Whatever reason you think you have, it’s not good enough.

        Try to legally enforce rules on how I can speak my own language? Do that right to my face? Some stick-up-the-ass language Gestapo comes at me with that shit, I’m liable to loosen his fucking teeth. Then he could see how ironic it’d be, when he couldn’t pronounce any fricatives correctly. Don’t test me. I will do it. And so will every other English speaker, regardless of race, creed, class, color, nationality, etc.

        That’s why no majority-English-speaking nation has any of these fascist-ass language academies. We won’t stand for it.

      • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Prescriptivist jerks. Let’s all dress up in $50,000 robes, call ourselves immortals, and pretend that we can control language.

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah in Sask I’ve encountered two french speaking people (first language Quebecers)in the last decade. Both spoke English.

      Both commented on how people’s expressions turn negative when they hear the accent. Which I can understand as it sounds very gutteral and unpleasant to the ear to me as well.

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Plenty in Manitoba but they’ll also speak English. St Boniface is an entire neighborhood in Winnipeg where French is primary, including the arret signs. There’s a number of towns around the province where it’s the primary language as well. Bilingual of course but French is the usual spoken language.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Make anglo minority in Canada again then we could talk.
    Also we could talk to make this project happened.

    Attend. Pourquoi je dis ça en anglais moi ??

  • fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I need conclusive Lemmy anecdata on a key question: is Quebecois French considered antiquated by continental (both European and African) French speakers? Are the differences subtle or not?

    • Synapse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not considered antiquated. The Quebecoise’s accent is considered exotic. Their effort to create new French words instead of just taking over the English one is also very cool. E.g: téléverser (download), divulgâcher (spoiler).

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I never got this: why do people in France speak an American language instead of a European one?

    • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      French-Canadian from Quebec here: the same way an American will use a french word mid sentence to add a certain je-ne-sais-quoi

      But they tend to go way overboard with them, ending with bastardized, barely comprehensible french. And they dare correct us when we use the proper french terms instead of the ones they abuse.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was watching a video on YouTube today where the person was demonstrating some things and kept going “viola”, but everytime he said it, he didn’t really pronounce the v, so it sounded more like moilah. One step away from moolah (slang for money).

        It was bizarre.

        I just couldn’t not hear it. I completely forget what the video was about.

    • bratosch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t get it. How is French an American language? I don’t understand the meme overall either

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        French is spoken in France and parts of north America. Most people are very emotional about their native language so they feel every deviation of it is just wrong.

        The most common and seemingly natural view is that France French is “right” and oversea French is not but honestly it’s arbitrary. OP turned it around and so I did too, eventhough I myself live in a non French European country. Well, we all hate our neighbors and the enemy is my enemy is my friend I guess.

          • joneskind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I’ve been believing this for a very long time but I’ve seen a video made by a French Canadian that proved me wrong

            As a matter of fact, when first immigrants arrived in Nova Scotia, most of the French people weren’t even speaking French, but regional dialects.

            What happened is that immigrants had to spend long periods of time in big ports of France before taking the boat to the new World and this is how they learned to speak French.

            But English was the language mainly used for trades, and local French speakers included a lot of English words in their daily dictionary (which were then exported to France)

            Then England took control of Canada and tried to eradicate the French spoken there because they thought it was impure and perverted.

            French speakers were pissed, and began to protect the language with tough anti-English rules

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Uh pretty sure protection of French language (and Catholicism) was agreed on from the start. Otherwise there would have been rebellions.

              • joneskind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Before the moment England took control of the Canada there wasn’t any protective law because there wasn’t a need to.

                Protection measures appeared after that

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  I’m responding to “tried to eradicate the French spoken there”. When they took over, I’m pretty sure they agreed to the French language and Catholicism from the very beginning. They didn’t try to eradicate it. Protection didn’t come from failed eradication attempts, protection was agreed to from the start.

              • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Language, religion, and laws. This is why Quebec is predominantly French, doesn’t use British common law like America and the rest of Canada, and was predominantly catholic at a time when a lot of places required you to follow the king’s (or queen’s) religion.

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  And why a Catholic school board exists in the entire country. We’re far past the point it should be allowed to exist, but afaik it’s in the constitution and hard to get rid of.

          • weariedfae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            IIRC that’s correct.

            Kinda like how the American accent is closer to OG British English than the current British English pronunciation.

            • wieson@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s a false fact. And it’s apparent, since there are dozens of accents in the US as well as umin the UK and there were dozens in the UK 200 years ago. They all developed in their own direction, being sometimes isolated sometimes cross-pollinating with other accents, but none staid the same.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      As a resident of Ontario…

      Fuck you.

      Also, very accurate, and I hate it. Take your upvote and get out.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Depends on where in Ontario we’re talking about … everything south of Orillia is basically the United States, between Orillia and North Bay is like the Ozarks, between North Bay and Thunder Bay is equal parts socialist and capitalist, and the entire France sized north is the chaotic frontier (I know because I’m indigenous and this is where my family is from).

        Ontario isn’t one mentality and every election cycle, there is more and more of a need to break up the regions because the south doesn’t represent the north and the north is constantly in conflict with the south.

        • sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          fair enough. My experience is only with what the provincial government does, so, like you say, I don’t get a view of the north.

        • sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          They both look like three oligopolies in a trenchcoat.

          Ontario politicians don’t show the same overt ideological capture that defines Albertan politics, but it’s there under the surface.

    • Luci@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah real french is skipping french class and forgetting that quebec exists :)

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I once encountered a theory that North American english was potentially closer to historical english because it was less influenced by neighboring countries. I doubt that, now. But it’s an interesting idea.

    • comador @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      As a yank who lived in the UK (East Sussex) for several years, I can share the sentiments of my mates there that they believe we Americans still speak a more traditional version of the language than they do now. Specifically pronunciation of words.

      For example, Americans have retained the pronunciation of the final “r” in words like “father” and “mother,” while the UK has dropped it. Americans have maintained the “flat a” sound of cat in words like “path” and “class” whereas the UK has mostly replaced that sound with the “broad a” of “father.”

      It’s not an exact science, but the rate of change in the language there has gone beyond the 18th century version we Americans still speak today and thus, it can be said American English, at least pronunciation, is more traditional.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      North American French is like that

      It is much more formal and traditional compared to France French (No idea about Haiti)

      Because of laws preventing loan words

      • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Québec French is a lot of things, but I wouldn’t call it formal. Heck, one of the core formal things about French (vouvoiement) barely gets used here in Canada, compared to France/Belgium/Switzerland where it’s omnipresent.

        Regarding the traditional aspects, I’d say it preserves a certain tradition, but it’s also full of innovations. It’s far from medieval! I wouldn’t say French-speakers in Quebec speak like kings and queens of the 1700s.

        It is very different to European or African French, that’s for sure!

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Then there’s the people who say Shakespeare makes much more sense, flows better, and better play on words when spoken with an older UK accent (or Irish?), so nothing like North American.

      (Lots of results but no easy blurb to read on what it was. But I recall hearing some and it was nothing like North American accent.)