• Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The other day I was thinking about the movie Scrooged with Bill Murray, and how during one of the Scenes of Christmas Passed he got his girlfriend a pack of Ginsu knives for Christmas and how that’s on-theme for his character who is obsessed with TV because Ginsu knives were a big As Seen On TV product and how someone on the writing staff must have went to college to think of that.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    GOG was good for acquiring and re-releasing OLD GAMES. somewhere along the way they decided they wanted to compete with the big platforms and be “We’re just like them but without DRM”

    I haven’t used GOG for years, they allowed me to relive a few of my old adolescence favorites, but stopped being useful to me a long time ago :/

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Selling old games and new games isn’t mutually exclusive, and more money tends to be spent on new games than old ones. It’s not unreasonable to expect that selling new games too could subsidise the work to make old games run on modern platforms.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        i mean I get that, but what I was saying was the original purpose of the store became an afterthought.

  • aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Let’s be honest, this was apparent for a long time. Steam, a centralised platform, has been making strides in Linux gaming and has been making innovation after innovation together with its steam deck. Gog, a forefront to freedom in gaming, barely did anything for the Linux gaming scene. No innovation either. Its just the simple (and well needed) premise of no DRM. It’s necessary, but not enough. It didn’t cater to its niche, it just committing to creating one under a premise. That’s not how you go forward. How does this connect to bad management? Well, I think that with good management gog would make different moves. And wouldn’t rest on its laurels so much.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s pretty hard for GOG. Many of the things people don’t like about GOG are not really GOG’s fault, they are just a result of small market share. Steam is the bigger platform, and so naturally it gets priority for basically everything.

      You game doesn’t work on Steam? Then you’d better fix it immediately, because that’s where the bulk of players are. But if your game doesn’t work on GOG… well… maybe fix it when you get some spare time. (Or maybe don’t have a GOG version, because you don’t want to have to keep multiple platforms up-to-date.)

      So publishers and developers are generally less cooperative with GOG. And GOG themselves obviously have much more limited resources to do stuff themselves.

      Steam’s recent work with Linux has been great. And I do wish GOG would have something like that. But again, Valve has vast resources for that kind of thing - and they’ve been working on it ever since the Windows 8 appstore threatened to wipe them out. (That threat fizzled out; but nevertheless, that was what got the Linux ball rolling for Valve.) I’m in two minds about whether GOG should try to boost their Linux support. On the one hand, GOG is all about preservation and compatibility… and so it makes sense to have better Linux compatibility. On the other hand, it would be leaning further into a niche; and working on a problem that is kind of solved already. i.e. We can already run GOG games on Linux with or without a native linux version… it just could be nicer… Maybe it’s not a good use of GOG’s resources to go for that.

      (That said, when I look at their linux start.sh scripts and see cd "${CURRENT_DIR}/game" chmod +x * it makes me think they could probably put at least a bit more effort into their linux support.)

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It adds the executable permission (without which, things can’t be executed) to all the files in the game’s directory. You only need to be able to execute a few of those files, and there’s a dedicated permission to control what can and can’t be executed for a reason. Windows doesn’t have a direct equivalent, so setting it for everything gives the impression that they’re trying to make it behave like Windows rather than working with the OS.

  • atempuser23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The launcher that they have is pretty rough. I downloaded it for Mac OS and it just wouldn’t run right. Kept closing down. If I could just download right from the website they’d have some money.

    If they draw is drm free games why only allow purchase through a custom launcher like everything else?

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There’s nothing wrong with the business model of selling older games at affordable prices. This is about poor management. (Or deliberately bad management by a “CEO” who was hired to destroy GOG to remove a popular choice from us).

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 hours ago

    People talking about money kinda missing the point this is a culture issue. They need to sort themselves out clean house if people can’t be reasonable for their staff.

  • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Thankfully if GOG goes down I don’t lose anything.

    Now if Steam goes down, I lose my entire library

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    15 hours ago

    As a result, no one on the team has the courage to express their opinion. Under Gołębiewski, GOG typically makes business decisions that may be profitable in the short term, but may not contribute to the platform’s long-term growth.

    Why half ass things when your the good guy?

  • azuth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The publication added that CD Projekt cuts jobs at its subsidiary every two to three years, with annual staff turnover reaching around 30%.

    As summed up by another former employee, “GOG has been acting well tactically from a financial perspective, but poorly strategically, and the current business model is likely running out of steam.”

    So nothing burger? Other than a corpo being anti-worker which is not news…

  • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I really like GOG so it would be highly unfortunate to see them go under. I guess we really can’t have nice things in this day and age.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      GOG is a side project of CD Project, the makers of The Witcher and Cyberpunk. They are massively wealthy. If GOG goes down, it’s because CD Project lets it happen, not because there is no other way.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Too bad, I use Steam and it works wonderfully on Linux, but i don’t want it to be the only option.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      i don’t want it to be the only option.

      Neither do I but it is. GOG doesn’t support Linux. Heroic is a 3rd party community effort. Valve is currently the only company making financial investments into Linux gaming.

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Many more companies than Valve are making financial investments into Linux gaming, including companies that own various Linux distributions (Red Hat, Canonical, etc.), CodeWeavers (who amongst other things have been contracted by Valve on a lot of Proton work) and to a lesser extent Humble Bundle.

      • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It does support Linux: it lets you download Linux installer for games that have a Linux port.

        The lack of GOG Galaxy on Linux just means you have to manually manage your games.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It does support Linux: it lets you download Linux installer for games that have a Linux port.

          GOG lets publishers upload various installers but GOG does nothing to support them, let alone offer something like Proton (which is open source, so they could take and integrate it for free).

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            13 hours ago

            No one needs to “offer” Proton. It’s available freely for anyone. I think some people think Proton is a Steam thing. It isn’t. Yeah, Valve did a lot of work on it, which is great, but it isn’t limited to them. Vlave has essentially unlimited resources, and I’m happy they spent some making improvements for WINE, but GOG does not have nearly the same resources. I wouldn’t expect them to put their effort into that. Valve only did because they were building hardware that they wanted to run Linux.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Valve only did because they were building hardware that they wanted to run Linux.

              That was part of it clearly but I think more so they wanted an escape route as Microsoft enshittifies (further)

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              No one needs to “offer” Proton. It’s available freely for anyone.

              And that’s how GOG does not support Linux: Paying customers need to figure it out on their own. They don’t even value their customers to a degree to take and integrate existing open source solutions.

              • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Is proton entirely FOSS? I do know that they are built on wine, but now that I think about it, I am not sure.

                • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Is proton entirely FOSS?

                  Of course it is. Proton-GE and umu wouldn’t exist if it weren’t.

                  but now that I think about it, I am not sure.

                  You could have headed to Github and just looked for yourself…

            • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              On steam I can click install and run and most games windows and Linux just work without further effort. This makes gog worthless to me. I could just use wine I don’t know why I’d bother.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That’s not how copyright laws work anywhere. You don’t own anything, it’s just a license.

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          GoG Vault would disagree with you on that.

          You can download the full installers and keep them, nobody can take them away or disable it remotely

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            What they mean is that technically you still are being granted a license to use it. The same was true for things like DVD movies. They’re technically correct, but missing the point.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            18 hours ago

            GoG Vault would disagree with you on that.

            They are free to disagree on laws but they are still bound by them.

            You can download the full installers and keep them, nobody can take them away or disable it remotely

            That’s true but if your license is revoked, you’re illegally in possession of the game assets.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          In case of Steam.

          With GOG I get an actual license key & terms that state my ownership.

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No you don’t. You get the same license as you do on Steam, here’s the license btw https://support.gog.com/hc/en-us/articles/16034990432541-GOG-User-Agreement-effective-from-17-February-2024?product=gog :

            We give you and other GOG users the personal right (known legally as a ‘license’) to use GOG services and to download, access and/or stream (depending on the content) and use GOG content. This license is for your personal use. We can stop or suspend this license in some situations, which are explained later on.

            Which is very similar to Steam. In both cases you can keep the files you’ve downloaded on your machine, and on most cases you can copy those files to a different machine and keep playing it. GOG has better marketing on this regard, but they’re both very similar, neither enforces DRM nor forbids it entirely, although GOG does tend to be a bit stricter (but they still allow it) whereas steam is a bit looser but knowingly implemented a weak DRM and let’s you know in the game page if the game has any stronger form of DRM.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            13 hours ago

            With GOG I get an actual license key & terms that state my ownership.

            No, the intellectual property is not transferred to you. You have no clue how copyright works.

              • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                For most people that is a distinction without a difference.

                So what’s the difference to making a backup of my Steam folder? The games I play have no DRM either.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              I totally understand your point, but when people talk about “you own nothing” they don’t really mean you “own” the content on physical media, they mean it doesn’t have DRM that requires an online service. You’re technically correct, but your pedantry is making you miss the forest for the trees, basically.

              • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 hours ago

                but your pedantry is making you miss the forest for the trees, basically.

                No. People here claim, that just because GOG cannot remote wipe your drive, people buying off GOG have a perpetual right to the games they’ve bought. But they don’t because that’s not how copyright works. If a game’s license is revoked, to keep playing the game is copyright violation.

                Not only do so many people not grasp basic concepts of copyright, they claim Valve could take away all downloaded games. No, Valve cannot remote wipe my drive either. I can back up my Steam folder. Many games on Steam don’t have DRM at all. It’s opt-in and the actual Steam documentation outright says not to rely on Steam DRM because “it is easily removed by a motivated attacker.” If games rely on crap like Denuvo, 3rd party launchers, or invasive anti-cheat, the publishers are required to clearly state so on the store page in one of those orange boxes. Users can make an informed decision on a per-game basis even with Steam. And those games that ship crap like Denuvo aren’t on GOG in the first place.

                So in the end GOG is a store that stretches the truth about game ownership in their marketing and despite all their Witcher and Cyberpunk money, they don’t care about users of platforms competing against Windows at all.

                • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  People here claim, that just because GOG cannot remote wipe your drive, people buying off GOG have a perpetual right to the games they’ve bought.

                  I think it’s pretty clear from context that they mean they have the ability to perpetually play the games because of the lack of DRM, not the right.

        • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Who says you have to respect the laws? Just pirate if publishers mess with players