True, but there is a lot of overlap. You could say that the social anxiety is what makes some people an introvert, since they just exhaust themselves from too much worrying.

Then what’s the point of your previous comment talking about the narrator being reliable or not? Sounds like you just had no actual point and wants to use inconsistent logic whenever you want by calling it wisdom.

All I’m saying is that a corrupt individual is not a reliable narrator, therefore it’s illogical to use their corruptness as proof of their reliability at calling out corruption. Your counter examples are not relevant because their qualities does not directly make their statements unreliable.

And again, I’m not calling out the truthness in this matter, since I also believe the IBA is corrupt, but I’m calling out your use of bad logic to support that position. I’m sure if you actually read my comments properly you’d understood that I never questioned the truth in your statement about IBA, only one of the logical reasoning you used.

Is the IOC a reliable narrator, then? Being a corrupt organization would put them in the category of being unreliable to me.

I think that’s just how the shooting stance works. Hooking your hand in your pocket prevents it from moving and messing with your aim.

It works well enough if you don’t mind the occasional disconnect and slow connection to wifi, which is true for a lot of people like me. It’s still pretty annoying to deal with sometimes, just not enough to go replace the WiFi card or anything.

While it may be true that IBA is corrupt, let’s not use the logical reasoning that IOC’s reputation for corruption adds more credibility to their claim. Imagine if Trump called someone corrupt, would his own corrupt reputation leads you to believe his accusation more? I don’t believe so.

We should avoid using bad logic to support a correct opinion because it only damages the perception of your other arguments.

As someone who did watch the Meg because someone else wanted to watch it, I’d say please don’t. You lose a lot more by going to watch it than you do by not watching it.

This is not AI, though. Just Excel’s pattern recognition doing its job.

Nice. I am not really suggesting that they are being actively silenced, since I do see them there from time to time. What I do notice is that stories that are critical of China always get zero or barely any engagement.

Not really a good indicator of lemmy.ml’s willingness to discuss China’s flaws. This is in comparison to the wall of text that love to comment whenever it comes to defending China or blaming the western countries.

We’ll see how many lemmy.ml users comment on your post this time.

And yet, people of that level use windows to game everyday. Shows you how much ready Linux is for mainstream if comments like yours still pop up regularly.

Can’t find this posted in !worldnews@lemmy.ml. Can you link to one?

Your point is idiotic, that’s why it’s easily countered by an analogy that is not relevant to the story. Maybe you should’ve countered him with a better point, instead of relying on overused talking points such as false equivalence to avoid thinking more logically. His point was only to show how stupid the point you brought up was, not to serve as an analogy to the real act.

Not only are you unable to think logically, you even had to rely on mocking my username to try and win this argument. Why so desperate that you had to use such a classic Internet debater move? The projection is really just the icing on the cake.

See, I said you didn’t understand his point, and you’ve just proven it. He never directly compared those two acts, but in your stupidity, you can’t seem to see something that obvious.

Just because you don’t understand his point doesn’t make it a false equivalence.

Oh, the article said 6 inches. I was going by what you said, which was 20 cm. That is closer to 8 inches.

If it’s 6 inches, your comment made much more sense.

Wait, your toothpicks are about 4 inches long? Is this another case of everything is bigger in America?

Yeah, but we’re talking about an underfloor cooling system here. They don’t really have a way to distribute the cold air like air-conditioning systems do. So in the Olympic village’s case, a fan should be needed.

If the AC was set to 26 °C, you’re expecting the temp to be below 24 °C? What are you even talking about?

Why would having fans means it doesn’t work? I use fans along with AC to make the cold air distribution faster, doesn’t mean my AC is not working.

Doesn’t lemmy.ml always complain about their comments being deleted by lemmy.world? Sounds like most people care about this issue.