• z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “You will not replace us!” shouted the white supremacists after centuries of erasing a multitude of other cultures, histories, and societies.

    • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Really shows you that their worldview leaves no room for multiculturalism lol. As soon as brown people are let into their country’s borders, bam, suddenly their whole identity and culture ceases to exist somehow, despite still being the majority.

  • BurnSquirrel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, I’m kinda on their side with this. They majorly changed an iconic character who had a distinct appearance. Ariel is pretty much an icon of the 80’s kids back before the internet, so the public zeitgeist was a lot more common and shared, rather than fractured with a girth of media options like it is now. Everyone knew and had an image in their head of Ariel.

    Normies don’t know who tilde Swinton’s character in dr strange is, especially before but even after the movies.

    To point out such things online is racist, or being a weirdo who’s mad about a kids show. Yet here we all are, posting about it again.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fun fact about the Lone Ranger, the most likely real world basis for the protagonist is a man named Bass Reeves. He was black, and an escaped slave. The misrepresentation has been present since the beginning, if I’m not mistaken.

  • Focal@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I feel like there’s a lot of cherry picking here too, because if we take the MCU, it also does some race swapping that nobody has a problem with.

    Nick Fury is one, but Samuel L Jackson is so cool in that role, it doesn’t matter.

    Heimdal is another one. Norse mythology, probably not a lot of black there, but Idris Elba is also so damn cool in the role that it does not really matter, and I’ve never heard anyone complain about these people.

    I think in general it’s more about if the people in the roles do a good job or not. Tilda Swinton did a great job. Johnny Depp… Maybe not so much, but I also do remember people were mad about that one.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    TBH I think the bird and in general the music score ruined TLM more than anything

    But I’m against the very concept of using Live Action films to perpetuate Intellectual Property rights while skirting any requirement to pay royalties to the original teams who made the animated films from which the remake was adapted 1:1 script and scene composition.

    A lot of the other examples here did give really weak or bland performances, I even think the Lone Ranger would have been better without Depp in it.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Personally I think a large part of the lack of outrage over the first four is that no one who watched the movies had heard of the source material. People who watch Marvel movies don’t tend to read the comics, but Ariel was a Disney movie (one of the most famous of all time) remade as another Disney movie.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Personally, I think the lack of outrage is because the people who get outraged by black people being cast for roles that were previously white characters, aren’t concerned when it’s white people being cast no matter the source material.

        • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          “Personally, I just want to chalk it up for people being mad for no reason so I can feel safe in my view that racism is over because Barack Obama or something.”

          • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Could this be because people don’t tend to get mad over things they don’t know exist? Naaaaah, must be racism. Anyone who disgagrees that racism is the most likely explanation thinks racism is fake.

            What is it with leftists and making mountains out of molehills?

            • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I am a silly little ignorant guy therefore everyone else is a silly little ignorant guy, I am the very model of a modern human.

              • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I’d pull up statistics on movie ticket sales versus comic book sales and point out that the movie outsold the comics by (conservatively) 200 to 1, but there’s no point bringing facts into an argument against a troll.

                • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Most of the media, leading the charge on the outrage, are people who consider themselves fans of the material, and claim they aren’t racist for being upset over the change, just mad that they didn’t respect source. Then you look over their channel and there is not one single video, where they do this, when source material is whitewashed. Even though there is plenty of that, in the stuff they claim they are only upset over, because the source material wasn’t respected.

                  These are the people who stoke this outrage, they often started as straight fan media, but found out ranting about people of color, and gay people, being in media made a lot more money. Communities centered around the fanbase, for these things, are hotbeds of this behavior. There is no way you can make this argument, about these people. The people introduced to the media, by the movies, get mad because of these people.

                  I don’t know how you can not know this, and claim enough familiarity with audience statitics to make your argument. So I agree with others saying you are likely going out of your way to make this seem not racist.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Name one outrage among conservatives in the US when a white person was cast for a role that was any other ethnicity in the source material. Sure, it happens on the Left, Netflix is especially accused of white washing (recent example: Three Body Problem). But, conservatives don’t give a shit when it happens the other way around.

          Regardless, I truly couldn’t give a shit who gets cast for what regardless of source material. If the actor/actress is able to play the part well, I come for entertainment and couldn’t care less.

          • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The best example I can think of where the race choices really got stupid to the point of offensive was the first “The Last Airbender” movie where the director race swapped the entire fire nation to Indian, made the water nation white when they probably should have been Innuit or something similar, then chose to mispronounce the main characters name to make it sound more ethnic when the source material was in English, so they knew exactly how it should be pronounced.

            Then for whatever reason, people got mad that the main character was white when it was the only character animated in such a way they could be white, and the tribe was a nomadic collection of people making it somewhat possible albeit not relevant to the nation theming of the other nations.

            Anyways, this triggered my annual Last Airbender rant, so sorry about that.

            • bassomitron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That poor movie was a travesty on multiple levels. Why Shyamalan was chosen to write/direct that movie, I care not to look up. My off the cuff theory was that he had kids obsessed with the animated show and he wanted to destroy something they loved after they accidentally broke his one and only Golden Globe award.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            People made a big deal over Sean Connery in The Highlander, although no one was really offended. It was just another joke

      • Peasley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personally, I think you are correct, but the person you replied to might also be correct. One likely amplified the other.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I dunno. It always felt weird to me that someone named Raz Al-Gul was an Irishman, or that a traditional Buddhist monk looked like a soccer mom that went all in on yoga.

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Correct. Nobody was bothered by Nick Fury’s change for example, even though he went from white to black. That was a wholly unknown character for most Marvel moviegoers. And Samuel L. Jackson is awesome in that role.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean tbf, all of the above have people enraged and people who dgaf, it’s just those flip flop depending. I’m sure there’s no shortage of people here, in this very thread, that aren’t cool with say Native Americans being played by white people, or that Scarlet Johansen played that one lady from GITS (can’t remember her name, never really got into that series, but she’s supposed to be Asian.) Understandably so, really, but still.

    I take it a step further personally, stop remaking anything and if you adapt say a comic or book, stick as close as humanly possible to the source material. Race/genderswapping and reboots for a moneygrab is cool or whatever but can we have good original stories again please?

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      My issue with Scarlet funnily enough is that she’s Scarlet. She’s too big of a star to really meld into the majors role. I just felt like I was watching black widow on screen. Sorta spoilers for anyone who cares but

      Tap for spoiler

      the majors body is full on robot so technically she could be any nationality and color but it would have fit better if they picked someone who fit her original motif since it sorta matters. With the whole, ghost in the machine thing. I’m a huge fan of the franchise and I’m sad that this was the big live action debut.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can get behind that too, but I was referring to the backlash at the time it was released, it was all “cast people of that race to play a character of that race because inclusion is good.” Iirc there was one around the same time that played a trans person but wasn’t a trans person who received backlash too.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thank you for sharing this. I never know why I feel so annoyed at people who are mad about it, but this is it.

    This is why “All lives matter” makes no sense

    • ALQ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I like to think of it like a broken bone. Yes, your overall health is important; no one is questioning that. But if you go into the ER with a broken bone and the doctor tells you that they’re going to ignore your injury in favor of telling you to take your vitamins, they’re an asshole who doesn’t care about your pain or healing your injury.

      Systemic racism is the broken bone. No one (except, perhaps, assholes and billionaires) disagrees that all lives have value. Saying “all lives matter” in response to “black lives matter,” though, is saying “let’s wilfully ignore the problem because I am clearly okay with the status quo.”

      Edit to fix typo.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        My favorite analogy for this, and the one that really made me ‘get it’, was posted on Reddit a number of years ago, and was something to the effect of:

        Imagine you’re sitting around the dinner table with your family, and your dad is passing around a bowl of mashed potatoes. However, instead of handing it to you, it gets passed right by you to your sister. And you speak up and say, “I should get some, too!” Your dad looks at you and says, “Everyone should get some,” and the family continues passing the bowl around as before. And you’re thinking, yes, that’s true - everyone should get some, but only one of us is not getting any right now and pointing out that everyone should get some doesn’t make me any less hungry.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “All Lives Matter” is like a Narcissist trying to bring the spotlight back to them. They can’t stand not having the attention, and will do anything to get it.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Marketing does matter. For whatever reason, they interpret “all X matter” as “only X matters”, and “X matters too” is not a memorable phrase

    • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We have a movement in Canada called “Every Child Matters” due to indigenous history. The most annoying thing to experience is the same idiots who complain about BLM commenting on this one. “Black Lives Matter? What the hell dude, ALL lives matter!” then 5 minutes later saying “Every Child Matters? No shit, what a stupid movement name!” Can’t win with these folks.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      To be fair casting for both Tilda Swinton as The Ancient One and Johnny Depps as Tonto were both criticized when the movies were released. Probably not to the level Halle Baileys casting was, or by the same people, but both were definitely seen as whitewashing.

      Its also likely The Ancient Ones casting got as much attention as it did due to the political nature of the change (seen as to appease China over its history regarding Tibet).

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most of the people who say “all lives matter” in that context don’t actually think that black lives matter.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What really confuses me about the outrage over casting a black actor to play the little mermaid is that a mermaid is a fictional creature. Why are people so upset that a fictional creature doesn’t fit what their particular preference is?

    • nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It should be as realistic as possible. My Ariel is fish colored for the same reason fish are. Maybe greenish blue for water camouflage, or grayish for sea floor camouflage, or brightly patterned if she lives near coral reefs or is poisonous. I’d love a cuttlefish mermaid for the flashing colors but I guess that’s not technically a fish, not sure if it matters.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If African folklore had a mythical character played by a white actor wouldn’t they also be criticised?

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago
          1. The Little Mermaid has changed so much since Hans Christian Anderson it cannot really be considered Danish anymore.

          2. Yes they would and rightfully so. I dislike the casting of the movie, it just so happens the movie was bad enough on its own.

  • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Eh, plenty of people voiced issues with the racial (and gender) recast of the Ancient One when Doctor Strange came out.

    Tilda Swinton is great btw.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most people realized it was done mostly to skirt the Chinese market. I think the major problem with the other groups is the lack of major starpower. I don’t think I can even name a Romani actress.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I suppose, then again it appears the main reason race was changed is to increase star power in a prominent role. Which is not the case in The Little Mermaid, as Halle Bailey is not a star. Doesn’t matter much now since the movie is bad.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Considering most Americans lose their shit at the slightest hint of an accent, it’s not really surprising.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think I can identify a Romani phenotype. Which just goes to show how little representation they get on mass media.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I thought they were just slavicish. I know Romanian is different but the archetypical gypsy in my mind is a black haired slavic woman.

      • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is a good point. Casting a genuine Tibetan actor would cause the house of mouse to lose all that sweet china money.

          • yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            No I think people would have been more angry if they got someone Asian but not Tibetan to play the character. Changing an Asian Male character to a White Woman makes it more obvious and direct.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I also thought Liam as ra’s al ghul was a really bizarre pick during the movie, too. But I guess I got over it quickly enough, because Liam Neeson.

    • TheSambassador@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think that this is making fun of the people who were upset at Ariel being black in the remake. The people this is making fun of don’t care about recasting race until it’s done from a white character to a black one. It’s pointing out hypocrisy.

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        True, but it is not done in a very genuine way. Each role had people complaining about the changes, the only real difference is the few times a white character is casted black the movie ends up being bad anyways.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ll say that when people notice the white character is recasted as black, it generally means the source material was absurdly popular and any follow up is likely to be pretty meh. The live action disney adaptations. of their biggest animated properties have been generally bad.

          Rinse and repeat for almost any reboot/remake of some iconic movie or show. The chances of getting it at least as right the second time around are slim. Even slimmer than bolted on sequels that generally do poorly even with the benefit of the original creative teams at the helm.

          They could have preserved the race of every character and it still would have sucked.

          • yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re probably correct, however I believe Disney and everyone else knows this and are choosing to cast black actors in order to claim the movie failed due to racism and not a weak script.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          only real difference is the few times a white character is casted black the movie ends up being bad anyways.

          Shawshank Redemption. In the source novel, Morgan Freeman’ character was a white irish guy. The reasons nobody complained were probably that a. there was no Xitter when the movie hit theaters and b. nobody knows it’s an adaptation anyway.

          • yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Same with Samuel L. Jackson playing Nick Fury or whatever The Boys is doing with characters. When the adaptation is good no one really cares.

            I have a feeling Hollywood companies intentionally do this to stir discourse and interest in the film when they know the script is weak. You never hear about these things when the movie is good, only when it’s the Ghostbusters reboot or The Little Mermaid.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Wasn’t it not just the casting of one character, but that they recast the movie to be all black? When I see something that looks like “recast the movie to be X”, I don’t expect very much and usually don’t bother watching. If this was one my favorite movies, I can see being upset that they would remake it just for race or gender (although now that I mention that, it could be hilarious to remake for gender)

        That includes “recast the movie to be white”, now that we’re getting lots of well done videos that don’t start as white.

        But I suppose it’s white privilege that I never saw an issue with most of these (but wtf, Johnny Depp?). They’re close enough and generally the character is not written overly specific anyway. Ms Marvel must be correct because the entire movie was based on her culture, ethnicity, history. If the movie was written about “generic American teenager” declared to be something other than white, would we care? Should we? Meanwhile, who cares about Scarlet Witch? Aside from”European”, there was nothing in the movie to make her anything specific. From the post about the comics, the source material is horribly muddled

  • Buttflapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s honestly really gross how the U.S. film industry works. There’s a widely held belief that you basically have to have a white lead character in most films for it to be successful. Look at marvel, just as an example. Every single main character was a white man or woman. Iron Man, Captain America, Hulk, etc. All white people. Black Panther was the exception, not that he was even really part of the avengers officially. He wasn’t really in their crew at their headquarters. But even the person who played vision, which was heavily dawdled in makeup… White person. That role could have been anyone! The dude looks like an alien, why did it have to be a white guy? Now look at Star Wars, another extremely popular franchise. Every single lead character is white without fail. Luke Skywalker, Anakin, the emperor, Leia, Han Solo, Kylo Ren, you name it, they are white. Mace Windu was the exception, and they just killed him off needlessly Like he was some inconsequential character even though he was literally the most important person in the entire Jedi order. Then Star Wars The Old Republic launched a video game and guess who is the leader of the Republic now? White woman.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m pretty sure the Supreme Chancellor in SWTOR is a green woman after the white guy preceding her was offed.

      The other side has a white woman queen, but to be fair, they are racists.

      That said, I would agree white people are overrepresented among humans in SWTOR.

    • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mace Windu getting killed was the turning point and point of no return for the three film character arc of Anakin Skywalker. That’s a long way from “needlessly”. Sure the character didn’t have to be killed, but the impact of him being betrayed and killed was enormous. The plot of the third film (and the entire prequel trilogy) culminated with his death scene.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The bones of the story beats leading to that moment were so good, but ruined by terrible dialog along the way.