The problem is I need Unbound to send queries via one network interface (the VPN) while the specific zone needs to be routed through another.
The problem is I need Unbound to send queries via one network interface (the VPN) while the specific zone needs to be routed through another.
I know what split tunneling is, but I have my routing set up exactly as I’d like.
The issue here is that Unbound seems unable to send queries to one forwarding zone using a specific interface/IP address and sending queries to a second forwarding zone using a completely different interface/IP address.
I’m almost at the point where I want to create a virtual interface that just has rules that say “if going to 192.168.143.1
use /dev/tailscale0
” and then have a default route to /dev/wg0
.
I’m not a professional but my current Tailscale + VPN setup has been extremely nice for the past year.
Plain HTTP means anyone between you and the server can see those credentials and gain access.
It it using HTTP Basic Auth by chance? It would be so easy to put nginx (or some other reverse proxy with TLS) in front and just pass the authentication headers.
Especially with music, if any of this is plain HTTP (or any other plaintext, non-encrypted protocol) and you live in a lawsuit happy jurisdiction you might end up with piracy letters in the mail.
I feel like “dollar” would’ve been smoother than “$3.44” but great rhyme nonetheless.
I started learning HTML at the age of 10 using FrontPage and Word. There were entire utilities dedicated to stripping out Word’s atrocious HTML at the time.
I’ve always wished Markdown was better supported in email. I work with external companies’ APIs a lot where email is the medium, and typically I use a Windows monospace font for code snippets (I’m on macOS but there are a handful of monospaced fonts that work on both).
It’s very clunky, and I wish the backtick notation would work out of the box. Whoever decided HTML in email was the way to go should be shot.
“Now with Flipper for Neuralink with Variable Shortwave Radio Interface you won’t need to carry a clunky device to communicate with legacy iLink security systems”
I’d never get past this. If a website forced this on me I’d probably stop using it, otherwise I’d just override it with CSS.
Best summarizing skills I’ve ever seen, damn.
I’m thinking of building my own and having it use Paperless’ API for invoices, receipts, etc.
I finally gave this a go a few days ago but wasn’t in love with the UI. I’d contribute but it’s written in .NET.
I’ll probably build something myself. One thing I’d like to do is have it integrate with other APIs (like Paperless).
I’d curl
from a machine on the same WiFi network as the phones just to confirm that HTTP is working. That way you’re not dependent on browsers that can be more finicky for debugging.
I’ve noticed that but I thought I just didn’t know how to persist it correctly and never bothered to find out how. If what you’re saying is accurate (which I don’t doubt) that sucks.
GL.iNet actually has a decent UI too. When I’m on the road I don’t necessarily love hitting the CLI (okay fine I secretly do); they keep the updates going for a long time too.
I didn’t have a great reason other than mind-blowing performance on my LAN, and with large files (which I have a lot of) performance is better too. Probably I’m not smart enough to answer this well, but I did just see this today: https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-611-filesystems/2
I’m a huge fan of XFS for network mounts. I think everyone else here is right that the best filesystem will depend on the OS, and picking one to make it compatible with everything has serious tradeoffs.
Oops, I realize now that my comment made it seem like I can’t figure out how to write an image to external media and boot it properly. It was actually more intense than that, so I’ve updated it.
This is the right question, it was the last 100% NT kernel before 9x ruined everything.