• TheChurn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This the was instigating event behind the civil war

    No it wasn’t, and it wasn’t even one event.

    There were literal years of border skirmishes before the North invaded on the 25th of June, 1950. The Bodo League Massacre is the name for a series of purges of suspected communists that began with an order from the SK President on June 27th, 1950. Two days after the North Invaded.

    Try again tankie.

    • BLU_Raze@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If hating tankies means you have to support fascist dictatorships, then I guess I’ll never hate tankies.

      • TheChurn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If hating tankies means you have to support fascist dictatorships, then I guess I’ll never hate tankies.

        Luckily it doesn’t.

        It is very possible to dislike more than one thing.

          • TheChurn@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I did not defend any fascists. I pointed out innacuracies in the prior posts.

            Ask the other poster why they felt the need to lie to make their points.

    • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      it wasn’t even one event.

      Well, that’s a refreshing take to see. But that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war

      • TheChurn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, that’s a refreshing take to see. But that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war

        Did you miss the part where the first such event didn’t take place until after the invasion by the North?

        • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope. That’s like saying the Emancipation Proclamation couldn’t have motivated any sides in the Civil War because it happened halfway through.

          • TheChurn@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The comment I replied to said this:

            This was the instigating event behind the civil war.

            Dictionary.com says this for the word “instigating”

            Causing, initiating, responsible for

            Please explain how an event that occured after the invasion was the cause or initiator of the war.

            If you cannot, then admit you didn’t read the thread and just came in here to muddy the waters.

            If you are too proud to admit that, just ghost.

            • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t claim they were correct. If you look above, I made a weaker claim than they did.

              that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war