• HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think you are being unreasonable in that argument. It’s not like they have the oil in cargo containers and can transfer it from one ship to another outside of port. The oil IS the ship.

    Sure they could dump it in the ocean? Which would be the dumbest of all options.

    Or they could seize the ships, and tow them back to port. Which looks like the options they took.

      • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So now I have to prove my geopolitical stance on an engineering and logistics problem?

        I can only give the facts, what people do with the politics is their own prerogative.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The logistics are pedantic. They took the ships under civil forfeiture. Made the company pay to transport the oil to Houston. Took the oil and sold it. They could have left the oil. Arrested the captain and crew. And fined the company. They stole it for… reasons.