• niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Sounds like physics in a way, a chaotic and random energy and focusing itself into positive work, creating something with order.

    • vin@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Umm actually, no because scientists are incentivised to be “nice” to each other for their career growth. It’s a set of circlejerks.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Scientist trash talking used be savage af.

      Nowadays though there have been enough “trashed” theories that later turned out correct, that people have learned not to discount any possibility.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        There’s trash talking in the other direction that can be equally savage. Ever been to a research talk where someone raises their hand and says “actually, this is all trivial”? The worst thing you can hear after you spend months working your ass off on a project.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Heh, I was just listening to the Planet Money podcast today about extreme UV lithography, and how the scientist presenting felt mocked out of the room. Of course this was 2000 or so.

        I’m unsure if this makes your point or disproves it. I’m leaning towards supports.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Oh I’m sure there’s still some super mean spirited stuff that happens today, but it remains interpersonal and fairly private.

          The old timey stuff was more like the kind where some scientist would go out of their way to straight up publicly slander people with ideas they thought were bad.

          The modern equivalent would be like scientists calling each other “smooth brained” on twitter for proposing new theories that didn’t immediately make sense.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      “great job improving the accuracy of determining a precise meter! Now let’s get back to it and see if we can make it even more accurate!”

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    facebook posters use this “urge to correct” on their advantage, posting minor mistakes intentionally in public groups, and since there is no thumbs down, it get promoted by means of getting lots of interaction

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Wikipedia is a great and wonderful moment in human history.

    But I understand that it can’t be monetized so fascist will attac

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    They are also a nonprofit that, if everyone who used it paid $3, would cover the cost.

    -Definitely Not Jimmy Whales

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    It would be great if it was just the nerds, and none of the pages had funded contributors pushing their spin.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    It definitely wasn’t nothing but that - you have to start with material to correct. For example, I didn’t make this comment until this post came along.