• zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Such a standard would require every response to include a whole historical account.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      No… what are you talking about?

      You said the escalatory actions were the Abraham accords, and moving the embassy to Jerusalem.

      I just pointed those were both actions taken by the Trump administration.

      So what requires a historical account? Do you mean you just want to site random historical events with no context, and if anyone points out when they happened, that’s somehow a bad faith argument, or an unfair standard to apply…?

      Oh my God… Did you really just read those “trigger events” in some article, have no idea what they actually were, or when they happened, but still decided to cite them in support of your argument…?