• Eiri@lemmy.ca
    0·
    15 days ago

    Any ideas for ad blockers that work with a blacklist rather than the contrary?

    I don’t want to harm the revenue stream of websites I visit unless their ads are unacceptable. So I want it not blocking ads by default. But I’d really like a way to block the website-breaking ads at Fextralife Elden Ring wiki. That shit is crazy; it breaks the search bar until EVERY ad (including autoplay video, even though I disabled autoplay video in settings) has fully loaded.

    I do almost all of my browsing with Firefox for Android.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      0·
      14 days ago

      I wish I could remember the name of an extension I had on my old computer.

      It hid all ads, but also clicked them all in the background. It accomplished 4 goals:

      1. I didn’t see the ads
      2. The websites I visited made more money through the clicks
      3. It cost the advertisers money
      4. It made the cost/benefit worse for advertisers since they were paying for clicks without anyone being influenced by the ads
      • SSJMarx@lemm.eeEnglish
        0·
        14 days ago

        You’re probably talking about AdNauseum, but unfortunately the ad servers can tell when a real person clicks the ad or when a bot clicks them.

    • Cynicus Rex@slrpnk.netEnglish
      0·
      14 days ago

      I don’t want to harm the revenue stream of websites

      Perhaps if a product cannot survive without ads it has grown too large or just isn’t that necessary? I too could be making extra by creating content and throwing ads on it, but it’s not ethical so I don’t. Humanity should always strive towards a utopia and a utopian society has zero ads.

      • Eiri@lemmy.ca
        0·
        14 days ago

        Servers and bandwidth aren’t free. Someone needs to pay for it. There are roughly seven ways to fund a website:

        • Complete volunteering, and maintainer pays all fees out of pocket. Only makes sense for very small projects, or when the maintainer is rich and has a great deal of passion or otherwise self-interest in the project.
        • Strictly fund the website with donations. That’s more or less how Wikipedia works. It can be hard to make ends meet, and it typically only works if your website basically offers community service like a charity or if you have very passionate users.
        • Freemium model: most users are just leeches and are subsidized by the few who pay for the premium version. This is more or less how free-to-play video games work, and some newspapers survive this way. It can be difficult to convince people.
        • Members only: you literally cannot use the website unless you pay. A lot of SAAS websites, especially for businesses, work this way. It can be a hard sell for a lot of service categories.
        • Ads. Sometimes combined with a freemium model, where you can pay to remove the ads. YouTube works this way.
        • Sell user data to advertisers or more sinister entities. Only possible if you have valuable user data to sell. Most social networks get a significant portion of their revenue from this method, but they typically combine it with ads.
        • Use venture capital to disturb an existing market at a loss, get massive mindshare and maybe even kill existing competition, and jack the prices up to repay your debts and turn a profit once you have customers and the market is more favourable. Airbnb works this way.

        What would you do for review sites? News sites? Video game wikis?

        Wouldn’t it suck if a wiki for an old game was just gone because there aren’t many players anymore, and now you just can’t access the info in it?