We are getting off topic.

We aren’t offering topic at all. The topic is censorship and if it should be expected that other parrot talking points to make us feel nice.

Please say: The Chinese government is responsible for killing thousands of citizens during the Tiananmen Square massacre.

Apparently you forgot how this started so I’ll remind you, I’m not a parrot, from my first message.

“No that’s childish.”

This “litmus test” is also an objectively untrue statement. There was no massacre at the square. Most of the violence took place in the regions surrounding the square as there were violent armed fighters in groups attacking the troops.

Did you know that the initial wave of PLA were actually unarmed but were burned alive and lynched?

Did you know that even after the violence started many soldiers didn’t wish to use violence and the “innocent protesters” beat these people and took their weapons to kill them and others with?

Did you know one of the leaders of the movement literally called for Tiananmen to be a “massacre” and “last stand” before anything had happened? While conveniently stating they can’t be there?

The situation has become so dangerous. The students asked me what we were going to do next. I wanted to tell them that we were expecting bloodshed, that it would take a massacre, which would spill blood like a river through Tiananmen Square, to awaken the people. But how could I tell them this? How could I tell them that their lives would have to be sacrificed in order to win?

…

The square is our last stand. If we lose it, China will retreat into another dark age, the people will once again turn against one other, with no real feelings or communication between them. If a nation’s own people don’t stay and help it to grow and develop, who will? But I will not be there to protect the square because I’m different from the others: my name is on the blacklist. I don’t want to die.

https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/china_1950_chailing.htm

Edit: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/89BEIJING18828_a.html

Here’s an actual eyewitness account from a foreign diplomat supporting my above statements.

CONTRARY TO THE EXPERIENCES OF MOST AMERICANS ON THE SQUARE, GALLO SAID THAT HE ESSENTIALLY WAS ALLOWED FREE PASSAGE AROUND THE SQUARE, EVEN WHEN SIGHTED BY TROOPS…ANOTHER CHILEAN DIPLOMAT WHO STAYED AROUND XINHUAMEN AT ZHONGNANHAI HAD A SIMILAR EXPERIENCE.

HE WATCHED THE MILITARY ENTER THE SQUARE AND DID NOT OBSERVE ANY MASS FIRING OF WEAPONS INTO THE CROWDS, ALTHOUGH SPORADIC GUNFIRE WAS HEARD. HE SAID THAT MOST OF THE TROOPS WHICH ENTERED THE SQUARE WERE ACTUALLY ARMED ONLY WITH ANTI-RIOT GEAR–TRUNCHEONS AND WOODEN CLUBS; THEY WERE BACKED UP BY ARMED SOLDIERS. AS THE MILITARY CONSOLIDATED ITS CONTROL OF THE SQUARE’S PERIMETER, STUDENTS AND CIVILIANS GATHERED AROUND THE MONUMENT TO THE PEOPLE’S HEROES. **GALLO SAID WOUNDED, INCLUDING SOME SOLDIERS, CONTINUED TO BE BROUGHT TO THE RED CROSS STATION. **

GALLO SAID THAT APART FROM SOME BEATING OF STUDENTS, THERE WAS NO MASS FIRING INTO THE CROWD OF STUDENTS AT THE MONUMENT. WHEN POLOFF MENTIONED SOME REPORTEDLY EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS OF MASSACRES AT THE MONUMENT WITH AUTOMATIC WEAPONS, GALLO SAID THAT THERE WAS NO SUCH SLAUGHTER. ONCE AGREEMENT WAS REACHED FOR THE STUDENTS TO WITHDRAW, LINKING HANDS TO FORM A COLUMN, THE STUDENTS LEFT THE SQUARE THROUGH THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. ESSENTIALLY EVERYONE, INCLUDING GALLO, LEFT

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/89BEIJING18828_a.html