• wazoobonkerbrain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Whether they are effective or not is definitely in question, but they are unquestionably intended to be informative.

    There is a big difference between “informative” and “unsuccessfully intended to be informative” and the latter ought not to exist.

    If they irritate you,

    It ain’t just me. I’m too lazy to dig it up but there was a recent thread about the media bias bot and the loathing was near unanimous. The objections were qualitative, e.g. the fallacy of using one biased web site to determine whether another web site is biased.

    you have the ability to exercise your right to block them.

    Opt in is better than opt out. Rather than asking every user who hates the bot (i.e. most users) to block it, better to provide something that can be subscribed to by those who want it.

    You being annoyed at something you don’t like isn’t a reason to not have it.

    Sure it is.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      That thread was filled with people downvoting anyone who even attempted to disagree. It was also full of people claiming bias and then not backing it up with a single source, link to offending pages, etc. so yeah no wonder it was full of people saying they hated it. Anyone who said otherwise (like myself) got fucking reamed.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        This user is literally lying about what the thread contains! holy shit the level of gaslighting and misinformation is insane! How can you function!?!?!