• Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Several states with republican leadership have required identification to view sites that have “adult content”. You technically can still access it without a VPN in these states, but I’m not trusting these sites with personally identifying information. Depending on the state I think you have to upload an image of your ID and other information. It’s really sketchy.

        • sznowicki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          What the fucking fuck. In Europe this would cause French and Germans combined beheading entire governments. One thing I want to keep to myself is my porn choices. Giving my ID to a porn site sounds like a big fucking NO

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think they’re looked up to verify they’re authentic. I’m not certain, but I’m pretty sure that’s the case. If it isn’t then it’d be easier to just take an image of a real ID and modify it rather than using image generation to hope it comes out correct.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh man, this is a much better comparison.

      It’s still not perfect, though, since technically porn isn’t banned, but it’s effectively banned by requiring ID checking, which major websites like pornhub refuse to do.

      But this also allegedly targets “culture”, just like China’s great firewall. It’s pretty damn stupid.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          There are 17 states that have passed or introduced bills requiring age verification for access to porn sites: New Jersey, West Virginia, Virginia, Oregon, Minnesota, South Dakota, Arizona, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, South Carolina and Florida.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            What a joke. My home is WV and I’m currently in VA. Didn’t even notice either state had a porn ban. Get your fucking religion out of politics though.

    • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m one of these Texas motherfuckers getting fucked with by this dumb shit. I am in the market for a cheap, effective VPN.

      I’m thinking about trying Express VPN, but I haven’t had time to do all the comparison shopping for which one is actually best. I don’t need a shitload of different devices, all at once. At most, I need to maybe cover one desktop PC and two WiFi devices. But I’d be cool with just one seat.

      Anyone got recommendations?

      • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d recommend proton vpn. They have a few other services like email and password managers but there free tier is more than adequate

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m using Private Internet Access. It was purchased by a company some people think are sketchy, but they work well in my experience and are cheap. If you really need security that you trust, maybe go somewhere else. If you just need a VPN that works and is cheap, it’s an option.

        • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I just heard that Express VPN was bought by a shady company, too. I wonder if it’s the same one.

          EDIT: Yep. It’s the same one. Kape technologies. They are apparently pretty evil.

      • Hexarei@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        My recommendation is to run your own instance of something like OpenVPN on a $5/month Digital Ocean droplet tbh

          • Hexarei@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Sure, I recognize that there are folks who won’t be able to pull it off, but there are also loads who can - And don’t know about options like OpenVPN. Figured it was worth a mention.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bout to be CO too, not just limited to red states unfortunately.

      Admittedly, it’s not just for porn, but social media in general. Either way, the same reasoning applies, I’m not giving a third party company my identity just for a social media account and I’m certainly not going to do it for porn

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You forgot the third car using a VPN to get all the content they’re actually paying for on all of their streaming apps

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Specifically American tiktok. The tiktok they have isn’t the same. Iirc It’s only educational stuff, and you get a time limit.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Meh, entirely different type of SM, what we really need is the defederated version of TT

      But video is expensive so it probably won’t happen for a long time

      Now if TT redoes their app to be defederated to evade US law that would be hilarious

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I saw a post for this service yesterday I think. I don’t remember the name of it or I’d post a link, but it is created now and I think it’s active, or will be soon. It’s only for short-form video though, like TikTok, which isn’t my style of content.

      • WamGams@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Supposedly Pixelfed or Peertube just added shorts.

        A big issue with that is when I signed up to peertube 10 months ago, literally the only videos I could find were French language protestors.

          • WamGams@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            If it gets people to start using it and uploading content overall it is a win, although my hope was that it would build out to be a PBS competitor

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s the VPN’s service.

      Anytime I see a misplaced apostrophe I assign some kind ownership to it. This one’s okay.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Please, don’t even touch this. With our RKN and useless pinnocchios banning random things extrajudiciously, I’d be surprised if we’d have any access to the internet in 2026. For those without a government issued pass and active service in bot farms, I mean. If I’d get limited to local resources, I feel like I’d give up on internet altogether. Can’t discuss shit there without pseudo-trad weirdos chiming in.

      It may be a major plus for the Internet as a whole if the cable is cut completely, but I feel like it’d only be cut for dissenting folks, while carriers of the official talking points wouldn’t ever get limited.

  • disconnectikacio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Tiktok and their inconsistent very sick snowflake moderation with punishing the appeals should be avoided. Ive stopped using it, deleted from my phone

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Security and testing localization will be big use cases. But privacy and or using banned apps, no so much. They don’t call it the Great Firewall for nothing. ISPs, VPNs, etc.

        If you want to use western social media , it’s not as simple as jumping into a VPN.

    • noroute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same in USA but a lot more secret. They for example don’t care what you download but will sure as hell care if you use it for something very bad. That how you see so many bad actors getting caught even hiding behind VPN/TOR. They will never use this in court of course, because they will have to reveal how it was done. No VPN/TOR or even your own server is 100% safe from the gov. Usually they have direct backdoors in data centers or hardware and software.

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same in Russia. I worked with a banking company that had a Russia office, and the company had to get government approval for the BOVPNs that were used.

      • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Regulated doesn’t mean they control all VPNs, it means they usually have laws requiring any use of VPN to be licensed, and usually is allowed for businesses rather than individuals. They also block via their firewall many providers. Of course, you could always use one illegally as long as traffic isn’t blocked. Just don’t get caught.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure it is. But it means that they can tell the VPNs to block the same stuff that everyone else is told to block.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          “the VPNs” is not a thing when literally anyone’s connection can be a VPN for someone else and nobody else would know