Yes, weirdly the very same website wrote about it back then (https://www.iflscience.com/fully-intact-dinosaur-embryo-found-inside-fossilized-egg-62004). I’m not sure what inspired another article now.
This was originally published in 2021 so I wonder why it has a new article.
https://www.iflscience.com/fully-intact-dinosaur-embryo-found-inside-fossilized-egg-62004
Is this an automated post? You told me this already earlier today and I told you that I am cross-posting but most apps do not yet recognise the function.
Archive link: https://archive.li/EYhPc
It’s mostly tabloid press covering this story, but here’s one slightly more legitimate source I found: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/08/01/zhanna-samsonova-tiktok-instagram-vegan-diet-dies/
(archive link: https://archive.li/Pz4S8)
This exact article was posted here 12 hours ago: https://lemmy.ml/post/2667920
Why does it make it dubious that the subject of a website is in its name? What if a website called “Stop Food Waste” takes about food waste?
Um, because they already have a clear agenda? They could be likely to be selective with their sources, not report on things that go against their view, etc.
I read the article and I encourage you to do the same if you did not already.
I read the article, thank you.
An article about population decline on a website literally called “Stop Population Decline” doesn’t give me the impression it’ll be fully balanced and unbiased.
This makes sense. Homes for a large numbers of additional people were needed, and these homes were available.
Is it just because of a funding crisis, or is it also because of rising prices partly due to sheer profiteering?
This exact article was posted here seven hours ago:
What a terrible headline. Tell me what the experts thought. I don’t want to see this kind of clickbait here. Change the title yourself if necessary, just don’t let this kind of shit slide.
…his boss immediately told a female employee without his consent. The man eventually had to leave the job due to mental issues that resulted from being ignored by the woman.
I wonder what her problem was. Homophobic or just heavily uncomfortable because of societal norms and standards?
I wonder what the exact terms of the deal are. For example, if Tunisia takes the money and does very little with it to stem the flow of migrants to the EU, will there be any consequences? How could it be monitored?
It’s literally in the first sentence of the article. “A widely used artificial sweetener deemed a “possible” cause of cancer is safe in limited quantities, such as consuming fewer than nine to 14 cans of soft drink a day, experts have said.”
Although it features foxes rather than cats, Endling: Extinction is Forever ticks a lot of your boxes.
For something less survivally you could try Catlateral Damage: Remeowstered.
I did use the cross-post feature. Many apps do not recognise or acknowledge cross-posting yet which might explain why this article may have appeared multiple times for you.