![](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/1c9a10b5-6684-4a94-8b85-7f1e55771c14.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4271bdc6-5114-4749-a5a9-afbc82a99c78.png)
I take it you haven’t heard about Free Beer.
I take it you haven’t heard about Free Beer.
Desktop Applications
The quote is a derivative of something Bjarne Stroustrup said himself¹.
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off
Intervene? I don’t think they have that kind of power ;)
Thank you.
Interesting that they’ll make it a user choice. Who would answer yes?
On 22 July 2024, Google announced that it is changing its approach to Privacy Sandbox. Instead of removing third-party cookies from Chrome, it will be introducing a user-choice prompt, which will allow users to choose whether to retain third party cookies.
Do you have a source for that excus… uehm… claim?
That’s the last stage of being a FOSS developer.
Unless someone has registered the trademark for those specific purposes you’re clear. A trademarks is only valid within a specific field of purpose. Trademarks are there to avoid consumers mistaking one brand for another.
There are a lot of entertaining articles on Techdirt about companies not understanding trademark law.
I agree and the requirement for an exact placement of attribution is not very friendly to derivate works either. I don’t think that section 7 of AGPL allow adding anything other than the exact terms in section 7 and it has a clause that allow removing non-permissive additions to the AGPL, but I’ve sent an e-mail to FSF asking what their position is. I would be very concerned picking AGPL as a license for my projects, if section 7 allow adding clauses like that. Anyhow the clauses were added in this commit, so anything prior to 7.3.0 is normal AGPL.
There is no free and open source version of Only Office. It fakes that it is licensed with AGPL, but they have added the following to the license, which in effect completely forbid you to redistribute it. It can be said to be Source Available.
The interactive user interfaces in modified source and object code versions of ONLYOFFICE must display Appropriate Legal Notices, as required under Section 5 of the GNU AGPL version 3.
Pursuant to Section 7 § 3(b) of the GNU AGPL you must retain the original ONLYOFFICE logo in the upper left corner of the user interface when distributing the software.
Pursuant to Section 7 § 3(e) we decline to grant you any rights under trademark law for use of our trademarks.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/master/LICENSE
You need to use a dmix PCM for you card as output.
If you type aplay -L | grep dmix
it’ll show you a list of dmix devices. You can set one as the default if you create a file named .asoundrc
in your homefolder with the content:
pcm.!default {
type plug
slave.pcm "dmix:CARD=Set,DEV=0"
}
You of course replace the value of slave.pcm with your desired card name. I just gave one of mine as an example. The above default configuration also takes care of automatic conversion, via the plug
pcm, for different samplerates and formats to the settings the hardware is set up to use. Every program that use ALSA for output will read the above file, but you need to restart a program for changes to take effect.
If you enjoy audio production I’m sure you’ll find some good use for Jack, but for audio mixing all you need is to use an ALSA dmix pcm for output.
A solution I’ve used for the glibc problem, is to build on an older distribution in a chroot. There is also this project which might be of use to pick a specific version of glibc. The project README also explain how to do it manually.
As for distribution, I prefer something like makeself.sh, that installs to either ~/.local/ or if it is to be installed system-wide to /usr/local or /opt. The concept is just a small shell script appended with a compressed archive, it is easy to modify and even create by hand using standard tools like cat. This is a method widely used by native Linux games.
Nice, but it is not entirely without JS. There is a tracking script from scorecardresearch.com
debian/rules:
dh_auto_configure -- -DWITH_TESTS=$(WITH_TESTS) \
-DWITH_GUI_TESTS=$(WITH_TESTS) \
-DWITH_XC_UPDATECHECK=OFF \
-DWITH_XC_ALL=OFF
CMakeLists.txt:
set(WITH_XC_ALL OFF CACHE BOOL "Build in all available plugins")
option(WITH_XC_AUTOTYPE "Include Auto-Type." ON)
option(WITH_XC_NETWORKING "Include networking code (e.g. for downloading website icons)." OFF)
option(WITH_XC_BROWSER "Include browser integration with keepassxc-browser." OFF)
option(WITH_XC_BROWSER_PASSKEYS "Passkeys support for browser integration." OFF)
option(WITH_XC_YUBIKEY "Include YubiKey support." OFF)
option(WITH_XC_SSHAGENT "Include SSH agent support." OFF)
option(WITH_XC_KEESHARE "Sharing integration with KeeShare" OFF)
option(WITH_XC_UPDATECHECK "Include automatic update checks; disable for controlled distributions" ON)
if(UNIX AND NOT APPLE)
option(WITH_XC_FDOSECRETS "Implement freedesktop.org Secret Storage Spec server side API." OFF)
endif()
option(WITH_XC_DOCS "Enable building of documentation" ON)
set(WITH_XC_X11 ON CACHE BOOL "Enable building with X11 deps")
# stuff inbetween cut out
if(WITH_XC_ALL)
# Enable all options (except update check and docs)
set(WITH_XC_AUTOTYPE ON)
set(WITH_XC_NETWORKING ON)
set(WITH_XC_BROWSER ON)
set(WITH_XC_BROWSER_PASSKEYS ON)
set(WITH_XC_YUBIKEY ON)
set(WITH_XC_SSHAGENT ON)
set(WITH_XC_KEESHARE ON)
if(UNIX AND NOT APPLE)
set(WITH_XC_FDOSECRETS ON)
endif()
endif()
I’m no CMake expert, but it looks like to me, from the first line of the above snippet, that the default in the upstream build script is WITH_XC_ALL=OFF.
Sadly Sci-Hub has not received updated articles in several years. Alexandra is waiting for the outcome of the trial in India. I don’t think it depends on what the outcome is, just that the trial needs to be over.
As @Caboose12000@lemmy.world already said, I’d recommend drop.lol (can be selfhosted). Filetransfers are direct between peers (unless you’re behind some hardcore NAS where UDP hole-punching via STUN is not possible).
I mean how I transfer a file depends on the situation. If it’s to someone on XMPP I’d just establish a direct transfer there. Sometimes I share a directory over HTTP, FTP, SFTP and so on. The easiest way for most people, because it only requires a WebRTC capable browser, is with one of the many peer to peer filesharing platforms like drop.lol.
Don’t be so sad, the list is shit.
I like drop.lol
Thanks for the archive link, even if I prefer Techdirt for these kind of news, it was nice of you to save me from visiting Wired.
I think that B is a problem for everyones eyes :)