• 102 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle































  • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlLol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Some people rely on ‘screen readers’ (software that reads text on the screen out loud when you move your finger over it) to browse content on Lemmy. Some screen readers can read text on images (I know Apple’s does, not sure about Android), but obviously it can make mistakes and there’s missing context a lot of the time. Hence the transcriptions.

    There was a group of people on Reddit who added image transcriptions in the comments of posts but it was rarely seen in the post itself. I quite like that it’s been more popular on Lemmy. For inline images you can add hidden transcriptions using markdown, but for image posts it has to go in the body of the post.

    There are also a couple of other benefits. The post is more likely to appear in search results if someone searches for text included in the transcription. And if the image fails to load for whatever reason, or the image host deletes it, you can get the gist from the transcription.


  • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlLol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Not sure; I’ve wondered that before too. If I had to guess I’d say people just keep naming future kings after previously liked kings - the first few king Louis weren’t all that popular, but later on there were some popular ones (Louis IX was named a saint, for instance, which may have boosted it).

    16 is certainly a lot of kings to have the same name. I believe there’s 20-something Pope Johns, if I recall correctly








  • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOPtoMemes@lemmy.mlThanks Google
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is an old image, so GPT wasn’t around back then. The top result of a Google search is often a sample of a webpage - Google estimates which part of the article best answers your question. The next sentence of the article probably tells you about the counting-rings method, but it was either cropped out of the image or Google didn’t choose to include that part of the article in the sample.