![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/cd7879c3-cd1c-4108-806e-f9ca45e9b22a.png)
The US Army says tampons are fine for patching bullet wounds in an emergency.
The US Army says tampons are fine for patching bullet wounds in an emergency.
This is exactly what I was thinking of. American liberals are almost entirely ignorant of how much violence their government exports – and especially how much of it is targeted specifically at leftists. Marxists haven’t gained power in the US because any time they started to build working-class support they got murdered.
Not really a surprise; the political establishment of even the Republican party got really sick of Trump during his time in office because of the chaos. He didn’t behave like the typical useful idiot President and torpedoed a couple of easy legislative victories by tweeting in rage when they were almost through Congress.
“Marxists have failed to gain power because they think too much” is one hell of a liberal elitist take from the author of this article.
When “we have a right to defend ourselves” is the excuse given for genocide it’s completely unreasonable
Isn’t this literally two days after she parroted the Zionist mantra “israel has a right to defend itself”?
I’m a Trump hater but this sounds like serious exaggeration
Every foreign government at this point knows Trump is really easy to bribe and influence, so they want him back in charge. Certainly not unique to China.
This is never a popular thing in any country when it’s attempted.
Why did the RNC invite a union president to speak in the first place? Seems very out-of-character especially considering what he said on stage
Looks like even Chinese citizens aren’t immune to “Murica best freedom” propaganda.
The Supreme Court idea of judicial review was, essentially, created by an early Chief Justice using the classic children’s excuse “the rules don’t say I can’t do this so therefore I’m doing it and you can’t stop me”
Edit: I had this somewhat wrong. After reading, it seems a lot of the people who wrote and debated on the Constitution wrote strongly in support of judicial review, and it was in fact voted on and approved by multiple state legislatures after the Constitution was adopted. It simply wasn’t worded explicitly into the Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall did issue an official ruling that made it a standard practice but it was not a new concept.
I’m referring to this, in the article.
The conservative justices appointed by his rival, former President Donald Trump, are “already gutting voting rights, overturning Roe, decimating affirmative action, and so much more,” Biden said. “Are we going to let that happen? We can’t.”
The Democrats are, in fact, letting it happen.
Yet another blatant, pandering lie.
Remember: when China does it, it’s bad and evil. When the USA does it, it’s patriotic and courageous and fighting for world freedom.
Not once in that report did the UN refer to it as a genocide, as I stated
When it comes to Xinjiang, I trust the UN’s own report that there isn’t a genocide happening
The sourcing is nebulous by their own admission and the phrasing of the entire article is overtly negative and inflammatory. It could be entirely made up and we have no way to prove it true or false.
I don’t believe a single word the CIA says about China and neither should anyone who is interested in the truth.
Their sourcing is, by the article’s own admission, nebulous. Don’t trust a single word the CIA says about anything related to China.
Classic playbook for him and his successive governments: constantly trading human lives for political power and votes.