hedidwot@lemmynsfw.comtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•I spent ~$35 on new cables and my LAN speed increased 6xEnglish
25·
1 month agoHigh quality cat 5e would have done the job.
Original cables must have been faulty.
High quality cat 5e would have done the job.
Original cables must have been faulty.
Some how I automatically read this in Greta Thungerg’s voice.
How dare you!
Claims to describe the claimed issues with the framework display but instead literally outlines the issues with the chosen OS instead.
Like… fine, be annoyed, but at least be honest. The framework display has no faults.
Linux had issues with DPI.
It’s still an issue, still legit, not it’s not a faulty display.
Why sell for so little? To make a point? If so then sell for the highest amount you can get then donate that to Ukraine.
About damn time.
Trying to find your way around an unfamiliar system where everything started with K was enough to put me off desktop Linux.
Yep. There was an assumption 20 years ago when common switches were 100Mbps and running cat5e that you’d have to upgrade cable to get the next speed tier, 1Gbps.
It propagated wildly, but was always incorrect. Cat5e was very much capable of gigabit Ethernet by design.
It was only beyond gig that you’d need cat6, and even then at short lengths 2.5/5/10Gbe has a good chance of working on cat5e anyway (but don’t do it).