![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/669b4e53-b3ed-4754-9b5b-66d463e58e84.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
Can You bring it down a notch. We’re all right here.
An aging Geodude…lemmy not gather much moss
Can You bring it down a notch. We’re all right here.
72 characters per line/card.
I really wish there was a consortium that you could pay into for a number of investigative news publishers that will give you a non trivial amount of reads (15?) per month before asking for site specific funds.
This seems like it could be a win for many.
Your argument before made it seem as though conscription was one sided. I’m not arguing with a stranger on the Internet… that’d be silly
Just an FYI, both sides including conscripted soldiers. Russia is 18 - 30, Ukraine is now 25 - 60.
Could be both
This is a nothing headline. Yes, they’re all going up and it ain’t great, but this will be happening for a while. Until we move off of fossil fuels, we can expect as such .
The headline is like, “Global population is at an all time high”. No shit. It will again be tomorrow too.
Those are our names. My parents were Less and More.
99 little bugs in the code
Take one down, patch it around
… 149 little bugs in the code.
Meet my kids, Sed and Awk.
Physics changes with retirements. FORTRAN should received it’s gold watch and shown the door about 20 years ago now.
We’re pretty good at deleting voting data :/
Coldplay 100%. If it was Taytay it would be understandable
1000 gal = ~1 G . On another note Fukishima area reported nearly 2 Gs during the 2011 EQ, and did not fail because of shaking. It failed because the tsunami overtopped and killed diesel generators that were supposed to cool down the reactor that was automatically shut down due to design.
I know you want it to be stated outright, which is unlikely to happen. However, section e does state pretty directly:
(e) Reducing both consumption and production of fossil fuels, in a just, orderly and equitable manner so as to achieve net zero by, before, or around 2050 in keeping with the science;
Yes, you can pick on ‘the science’ and what ‘net zero’ means, but unequivocally phasing out all fossil fuels in 27 years is not achievable unless we found ways to completely replace our current infrastructural needs by that time. This includes upscaling biodiesel and ethanol production to run existing machinery that cannot yet run on electric or hydrogen power, including planes, freighters, etc.
Only downside is when you’re at a friend’s place and realize too late that they don’t have such an awesome amenity. You end up being the toilet slamming asshole, yet again.
Burning sustainably grown plants is a net zero carbon addition to the environment. It’s not what you want, but it’s a step in the right direction.
very appreciate