• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2024

help-circle

  • doctortran@lemm.eetolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldAs it should be
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    That’s generally what you hear from people who have basic use cases and simply can’t fathom other people may want or need different things from their devices.

    Which is fine, they don’t have to understand. If stock is good enough for them nowadays, more power to them.

    What I’m sick of is the condescension. This bizarre thing where they somehow think a person wanting control over a device they paid for is worthy of derision or shame.

    It’s like if someone who only checks their email on their laptop laughing at someone using a desktop for heavier work, for no real reason other than thinking using technology differently than themselves is silly.

    That other comment is a perfect example, and indictive of this weird subculture in Android spaces that hates Google but seems to be drinking from the same user-hostile Kool aid.

    Personally, I’m an odd case, in that I didn’t used to root or use custom ROMs at all until recent years. Basically since Android 10, simply to get around the needless roadblocks and restore the functions I want. I was fine with stock for a long time, until Google started becoming Apple.


  • doctortran@lemm.eetolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldAs it should be
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Shit like this is why I can’t abide GrapheneOS or their cheerleaders.

    It’s legitimately the same attitude as Google itself. This parental, condescending tone, acting as if wanting freedom to control their own devices is somehow irrational. Continuing to push this toxic idea that handcuffs are the only way to protect users. Like a sysadmin at a workplace, but without the justifiable reasons.



  • doctortran@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldStandoff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    if you fuck it up, you go to jail

    No, no you don’t. This is like a child’s understanding of how it works.

    If you fuck up they often don’t even notice unless it’s substantial, otherwise they just send you a notice. You have to be willfully refusing to pay taxes for a while, repeatedly, before you’re in trouble (tax evasion) or commiting actual tax fraud.

    Why would the IRS send you to jail for making mistakes on your taxes? Where taxes are now paying for your incarceration, and you can’t work to make the income to pay taxes.


  • doctortran@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldStandoff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Strictly speaking, tax filling software, even the free ones, have simplified it all so much that for people who have a single source of income from work and not a lot of tax forms to collect (most Americans), it’s pretty trivial. Maybe 30-60 minutes, once a year.

    Less than ideal but far from the grueling, soul sucking work I was told would plague my adult life when I was a kid.

    That’s why the IRS is finally doing their own online filling system. No more making Americans shell out for software, so everyone gets a nice, simple tax season.


  • doctortran@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldStandoff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    That’s just for free tax filling software, i.e. a government sponsored TurboTax alternative. And that was definitely needed.

    What they’re talking about is not having to actually do the filling at all, or at least only having to file in certain cases. The government pays for employees that look at your stuff, says “that’s the amount”, and asks you to confirm.

    Granted, with the way tax filing software has advanced, and how simple the vast majority of people’s filings are going to be, the difference is not very substantial anymore. The majority of people just need to click through the screens and answer the questions, so it takes a little time but it’s hardly a true hassle.

    The reason it’s been like this in the US for so long is because of the heavy lobbying to keep software like that proprietary and the system complicated enough that people need to use it.

    But it’s also been because of decades of conservative bullshit refusing to fund the IRS to the degree that they could provide the services that other countries get. IRS literally could not and cannot afford the manpower to handle the taxes of every American for us. Software lets them circumvent that.


  • doctortran@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldStandoff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Vote for people who will increase funding to the IRS so they can manage all this.

    The reason it’s been like this for so long is because they don’t have the manpower or (until recently) the technology to handle the sheer numbers. Lobbying from TurboTax and shit also played a big part, but even without that, they straight up can’t afford to do all this when they’ve been strangled of funding from decades of conservative legislation.



  • There aren’t any good search engines anymore, because there isn’t a good internet anymore. SOE has buried the internet’s wealth of information and centralization starved out all the spaces where information used to be. Hell half the forums that used to appear in search results aren’t even online anymore, and live only in the way back machine (which doesn’t come up in results).

    There’s so little to find anymore compared to the halcyon days of search engines we remember.



  • doctortran@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldDying towns
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    This is a new thing that smaller towns are trying to do to take advantage of an increase in remote work.

    The meme is also misleading because it’s implying that this is something they’re giving to everyone that moves there for a limited time, when it is only 10 people. It’s also implying that there’s not enough people there to pay taxes, which doesn’t actually make sense because that’s not how taxes work. There would definitely be enough tax income if they didn’t care about the future of the town. What they’re trying to do is revitalize the area and trigger growth, and they need more income to fund that revitalization.


  • doctortran@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldDying towns
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    We’re talk local here, not national.

    Even if they started taxing the rich, there wouldn’t be many to tax in the area.

    The median household income in Cumberland was $47,235 in 2021, which marked an an increase of 903(1.95%) from $46,332 in 2020. This income is 63.31% of the U.S. median household income of $74,606 (all incomes in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars).

    Top 5%: The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 302,286, which is 173.49% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 3113.14% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

    https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/cumberland-md-median-household-income/#income-by-quintile

    Even so, it’s likely the only reason they live there is low taxes. We’re not talking national taxes here, this is local, and they can be absolutely sure if they tax those wealthier people any more than they are, they’ll move away.

    They absolutely should do that, and give a firm middle finger to the back of the wealthy assholes as they move to their new mansion in whatever backwater they’re moving to next, but it doesn’t solve the inherent problem: the tax base is too small and too poor.

    This is just a mountain town that has died slowly after the death of industry there post World War II, and frankly there is no good way to save it because there’s no way to convince anybody to take their industries up there.

    What they’re doing here is trying to use the new changes in remote work to potentially trigger a revitalization. It may work, but I have my doubts.







  • This is more or less how it worked on Reddit. The admins handled vote spam or abuse, there was absolutely no expectation for moderators to have that information because the admins were dealing with the abuse cases. Moderators only concerned themselves with content and comments, the voting was the heart of how the whole thing works, and therefore only admins could see and affect them. Least privilege, basically.

    I think a side effect of this, though, is that it increases the responsibility on admins to only federate with instances that have active and cooperative admins. It increases their responsibilities and demands active monitoring, which isn’t a bad thing, but I worry about how the instances that federates openly by default will continue to operate.

    If you have to trust the admins, how do you handle new admins, or increasingly absent ones? What if their standards for what constitutes “harassment” don’t match yours? Does the whole instances get defederated? What if it’s a large instance, where communities will be cut off?

    I don’t ask any of this as a way to put down this effort because I very, very much want to see this change, but there’s gonna be hurtles that have to be overcome

    Ultimately I think the best solution would need assistance from the devs but I’m lieu of that, we have to make due.


  • Admins only. Letting mods see it just invites them to share it on a discord channel or some shit. The point is the number of people that can actually see the votes needs to be very small and trusted, and preferably tied to a internal standard for when those things need acted upon.

    The inherent issue is public votes allow countless methods of interpreting that information, which can be acted on with impunity by bad actors of all kinds, from outside and within. Either by harassment or undue bans. It’s especially bad for the instances that fuck with vote counts. Both are problems.