Its my homepage for any new tab, and most of the time I just use it as a shortcut to get to the tool I want. Latency is ok for a quick view of status, but I get alerts, so I don’t really use/care about that as a feature.

But the calendar I use all the time. Upcoming shows, events for the family, etc.

100%

I’d love some suggested communities related to !selfhosted@lemmy.world!

Recommendations are welcomed

And I’ll remove it.

To be clear only AIP would be in the title, you can mention the hint and the where in the disclosure comment

Promo, to be clear, is a self promotion post.

“I found a neat project” doesn’t apply, because you aren’t affiliated and wouldn’t know how it was developed, if AI was used and how, etc. You also wouldn’t be trying to get stars, clicks, donations, or payment for that software, so the promotion rules do not apply.

Its just a regular post.

Yes, because it is a bit different than a search engine. It may not be changing the files, but it is telling you the way to do it. It might give you an outdated method/pattern, it might ignore conventions, and most importantly, it doesn’t really understand the problem its solving. Its not finding the optimal answer, its finding the most common.

So the resulting answer may work, but not necessarily be right. In a disclosure (see the new thread) that would be referred to as “hint” for lllm use.

That doesn’t mean the answer you got was necessarily wrong either, just an answer based on an amalgam of the most common for all the code fed into the model, no matter when the code was written.

It would be put into an ai disclosure, so it qualifies for a tag. Make sense?

https://anarchist.nexus/c/selfhosted@lemmy.world/p/757813/selfhosted-ai

Please be sure to let me know when the community agrees with you. Or start a new post, if you’d like.

Edit: For your edit, https://anarchist.nexus/c/selfhosted@lemmy.world/p/746919/rule-2-clarifications-and-new-rule-proposal and https://anarchist.nexus/c/selfhosted@lemmy.world/p/753349/rule-7-adjustment

None of this is specifically about you, FYI.

There have been a good number of posts, and there are some people very solidly anti AI anything, some who use it as a tool, and some who use it for everything. That combo meant we need rules about it - in addition to the rules about account age and f/loss exceptions and the like.

Edit: For the record, the 100% vibecoded app I tested was posted by someone else.

That would just be keepass, which is what I use.

Keepass has native support for ftp, http, https, and webdav, and with a plugin supports scp, sftp, and ftps through the native save/open from url. There are even plugins for proton drive, google drive, onedrive, s3, box, dropbox… etc.

What else do you need/what do you need a fork for?

regardless of the tags, this will mostly speed up the dogpiling.

Yep.

But single word comments getting posted repeatedly can be removed, so while I don’t think the up/downvotes will change, I think the comment section will.

And maybe those folks who rush to downvote will realize they can just filter out the posts instead. We’ll see how that works out though.

You are more than welcome to offer another option.

I’ll mention:

• No tag is generating reports
• No tag is causing a bunch of unhelpful comments
• No disclosure is generating reports
• Too basic of disclosure is generating reports

Please, feel free to provide an option.

I’ll point out that what you’re commenting on specifically applies to promo project posts, and nothing else.

I’d love an idea to trim it down… but with the wide varieties of ways AI can be used, its hard.

I’m a good example of the “problem” person in a way. I’ll test all kinds of things (including a completely, 100% vibe coded app posted here recently… in a sectioned off vlan of course), but what AI was used for influences where I look. Documentation? Ok, not the worst, but I’m going to check for human review/blatant llm goofs. You used it to figure out how to talk to a serial controlled endpoint? Ok, thats what needs to be checked first.

You made the whole ass thing with Claude? I’ll test it like I said, but I doubt it would ever end up anywhere near my own production use, its more as a curiosity. 99/100 that level of generated is basically the same as calling it unmaintained imo.

So there is definite value to knowing where/how/how much, and if the comments consist of things already stated and just add “slop”, thats going to get deleted, its already disclosed, the people who comment that should filter instead. Its a two way benefit this way as I see it.

That said - I’m always open to options here, but considering recent comments and reports since I’ve taken over moderating, something is definitely needed.

Edit: And just to mention - nothing is ever set in stone, if you’ve not seen my other comments about it. Should anything change, or it becomes unwieldy, or someone finds a workaround to abuse, whatever - its always open for discussion.

Disclosure itself is a need, and I can confidently say there are enough people who are “no ai ever”, “all ai all the time”, and “only the AI use I agree with” to make something needed.

About the only way to simplify would be to not define the disclosure types, just to disclose it, but then half the post will be discussing where and how if its not defined (along with a bunch of reports about not fully disclosing AI use).

If promo posts included that up front, I don’t think it would be an issue, but its rare that any post includes even “I used/didn’t use AI”, if that.

Don’t think I need the model tbh, I’m generally on enough to address the untagged. The annoying part would be making the same comment over and over again (thus the short bit of python)

That would be me, yes. And considering what I already get reports on, this makes for clear practice and would overall reduce the issues that are currently out there.

The only ones with extra effort will be promo posts, and this disclosure is regularly requested of them anyway.

You’d also need to define “low effort ai”.

I don’t see that working, sorry.

As a thought, if a repo is already using ai-declaration.md or a similar ai disclosure, I think posting a link to that declaration as the reply to the AIP comment should count as the declaration reply, since they are already providing that information.

So I’ll go back to my previous comment; you’re not actually interested in understanding the use, you have a pre-determined (and uninformed) view of use and operation, and providing that information as an example is “long-winded”.

Ill be done with this discussion now. Enjoy your day.

You’d be wrong.

The fields aren’t all the same kinds of values, which requires relationship between the data to be evaluated for entry.

You’re assuming this is transposing contents, which was not the issue. Your example is what was initially planned and halted before transitioning to the approach I helped deploy.