Prolog is not suitable for any problem domain, although this is more readily apparent for some domains than others.
For real, for real.
Prolog is not suitable for any problem domain, although this is more readily apparent for some domains than others.
For real, for real.
You should save some part to mail them later ,so they can never be sure when their are done with you.
Generally, forcing developers to code something has been considered “compelled speech”
I’m European so I don’t quite understand.
Say person A paid person B to say X and had a valid contract. If B didn’t say X can person A sue person B to compel performance of contract or just money back/damages?
At least for new games wouldn’t it just be an implied part of the purchasing contract, meaning money back at least.
I agree with the sentiment but …
then nothing can be bricked because on paper you can desolder the rom chip and put another one in place.
Companies already put serial numbers in components and configure them so only specific ones work together, requiring OEM tools to pair them.
It’s imaginable that someone makes something similar with e-fuzes instead.
A yes, the two genders of binary file formats: renamed sqlite file and renamed zip folder.
spy satellites > spys > conflicts caused by information mismatch
What is the methodology called where you:
Plan to go to orbit, blow up seconds into the flight, and declare it a success.
Plan to refuel in orbit, make it minutes before the rocket brakes. Fire the FTS, it fails, the rocket blows up a minute later und declare it a successful test of the FTS.
Argue to NASA that you are not the limiting factor to the moon mission planed for the end of the year, despite delivering none of the milestones.
FTS = flight termination system
I think Dylan Beattie once said: If you don’t have a plan, how can you choose not to follow it?
Websites have grown beyond mere scripting.
Rust is about more than just nicer pointers, it has a very expressive type system that enables correctness rarely seen outside FP.
The new version seems to fix that since your comment was written, but it will stil panics if less than 2 samples are provided, unless the crate it wraps panics at an earlier point.
let peak = buf
.iter()
.copied()
.enumerate()
.take(self.sample_count / 2)
.max_by_key(|(_, s)| (s.abs() * 1000.0) as u32)
.expect("to have at least 1 sample");
Instead of
if let Some(a_) = a{
()
} else if let Some(b_)=b{
()
} else {
dostuff
}
you could just use
if a.isNone()&&b.isNone(){
dostuff
}
Also if you don’t use the value in a match just use _
Aviation, Health, Space and Car industry have only 3 certified languages that they use. Ada, C and C++.
Rust is automotive certified since over half a year. https://ferrous-systems.com/blog/officially-qualified-ferrocene
It needs to happen twice. I would help you but I still poses the indestructibility of youth.
I think the person also needs to be Catholic.
EVs only eliminate tail pipe pollution, otherwise they are more of the same.
They are multi ton metal boxes rolling on rubber wheels over asphalt roads, often to transport a single person. The create the same amount of traffic and waste the same amount of land on parking. Due to their heavy battery and better acceleration they create more fine particulates of wheel rubber.
EV are a Verkehrsrichtungsänderung, a Verkehrswende consists of trains and public transit.
Sleep sort is kind of like count sort but with added overhead. Both have a complexity of O(n+m) with n being the length and m the value of the max element.
The optimum of O(n * log n) is based on the assumption that the only information about the values is obtained by comparison. If you operate on integer keys I would recommend radix sort. It has a complexity of O(n * w) where w is the length (read logarithm) of the key.
I can’t find the name/source at the moment, but if you enumerate all turing machines and run them concurrently* you will find the optimal algorithm for your problem in O(1) and executed that.
To my knowledge the algorithm is so inefficient on small input that it takes hours to solve integer addition.
* You run the first turing machine one step, than the first two one additional step, that the first tree… This allows you to run an unlimited amount of TMs an unlimited amount of steps.
Keyword reserving is always exciting.
In this case it’s gen, which allows iterators build on the state machines currently powering async.
Here is a contrived use case from me.
It’s not as groundbreaking as async but it’s a convenience. And hey, you could write futures without the async/await keywords, but it’s easier with them
Look at me, I have a friend at bell labs.
We had to use vacuum tubes, and we liked it.
The main difference is that WASM is an agnostic bytecode without a gc while the jvm is opinionated in a java way. It has a gc, focus on dynamic dispatch and it has knowledge of concepts like exceptions, classes and visibility.
All this leaking of abstractions means languages like java and kotlin are well suited, scala has hit problems and c couldn’t be compiled to java bytecode.
found one
The nation starting wars and extracting fossil fuels is soooo concerned with the extinction of humanity.