• 1 Post
  • 19 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 11th, 2025

help-circle






  • You don’t minimise the risk of car death because you are way better putting in measures to reduce your risk of dying in a car crash than dying in some weird grid failure that happens once in a generation.

    It’s about understanding risk. You can’t just say avoiding any risk for anything all the time is good.

    You just chose a hill to die on. That a 1 in a million chance whatever the cost is worth it.

    But moving closer to work, a WFH job, cycling, only getting things delivered to you house, taking the bus, walking. No that’s too much you have a seatbelt.

    Yea well I have a blanket and a grid that has never gone for an extended period in my lifetime. I’ll be fine. I have been in more car crashes as an adult than I have been in blackouts. Car avoid is a much better exercise in spending money than grid back up.

    Hell for grid back up a standalone batter or generator to run the fridge is a better spending of money. Or an electric car.

    But again it’s your hill to die on so feel free.


  • I have literally never even heard of my grid going down for 24hrs and I’m not talking constraint to my lifetime. To think it happens every 2 years is outstanding.

    You also do not get any additional benefits. The cost is being able to run off grid doesn’t get to any additional benefits like being sell back to the grid. Obviously you need to pay for batteries and stuff beforehand and the logical reason for buying batteries stands. But to upgrade your system to an event that has literally never happened before seems silly.

    Spain just royally fucked up on a grid level and not something that is likely to occur again. They need to spend more on their grid which they are.







  • Wind power is paid for if it is used or not.

    It could be a lot cheaper up in Scotland where it is often wasted. If it’s cheaper up there more industry will move up there and use more of that cheap electricity and it will mean less is wasted.

    But this would benefit Scotland at the expense of England so it’s not going to happen. As such electrical prices are same around country which keeps jobs down south and electricity expensive.


  • You know why right?

    The grid is constraint and because of this it makes prices really high where the congestion is. Now the logical thing is to allow a different price where there is free energy like in Scotland verse where it is constraint.

    But! The issue is where it is constraint and that’s south east England. And as everyone in the country knows no one gets anything in the UK unless south east England has more of it for less.

    So higher prices in SE England is not going to happen. If it was the other way around I’m certain the government would say fuck the Scots they should have more wind power if they wanted cheap electricity.