![](https://communick.news/pictrs/image/3f4d7ed7-06de-4570-8de2-e748d1a62517.webp)
![](https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/ccbc1d32-aa21-4d26-bb28-42e63bd83083.png)
The comma separates the figures, from the costumes.
The comma separates the figures, from the costumes.
You had my curiosity.
Now you have my attention.
It would fall under rule 3 I’d think.
“Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to.”
I’m not sure what you’re talking about.
None of the major Fediverse projects have real monetization.
Why single out PeerTube?
Why would you expect monetization at this point?
Do you think it should be monetized, or are you just surprised it hasn’t been?
What form of monetization are you imagining?
I’m fully aware, and disagree.
Someone else called it a Slippery Slope. That’s closer, but still not quite right.
It’s actually Reductio ad Absurdum.
Which is a useful thought exorcise when analyzing many ideas.
They won’t see it. Their “news” sources won’t cover it.
Is it?
Are you saying you would support bad people under the right circumstances?
It’s your idea.
All I did is assume all good people agree with you.
Do you think they’d stop being bad people if they couldn’t make an honest living? Would it be better or worse if they were on the street? Do you think they might resort to criminality also?
Do you feel better knowing they aren’t getting your money? Even at the cost of them ever doing anything good for anyone?
Is it harm reduction if all the bad people couldn’t make an honest living? Would it be better or worse if they were living on the street? Do you think they might resort to criminality also?
I’m sure a few bad people make a living maintaining it, and all the roads you depend on everyday.
Bad people are everywhere, doing all sorts of jobs you appreciate.
It sounds like you’re arguing that bad people shouldn’t be paid to anything good.
Sometimes terrible people can do good things.
Those good things should be supported.
Judge a project on it own merits.
People still use the Autobahn.
I’m stupid. That’s obvious in retrospect. Thank you
What’s TTC?
I tried to look it up and found:
Trying to Concieve with a bunch of Christian advice.
Thinking Theologically Conference which looks like an apologetics workshop.
Neither makes a lot of sense for him to bring back
Or re-release the same book with a different title.
It’s the thought that counts.
If one is the other, than what’s on which side of the equation doesn’t really matter. They’re still the same thing.
So sure a calzone is also a burrito. No difference really.
Burgers are sandwiches.
Hotdogs are tacos.
Burritos are calzones.
There are no other RCS clients, just Google Messages.