Give it all away anyway. Screw that genie, wealth hoarding jerk. At worst he kills you and you leave a saintly legacy.
Give it all away anyway. Screw that genie, wealth hoarding jerk. At worst he kills you and you leave a saintly legacy.
I did some digging on these also show its an American group paying for it. I’ve reported the group to google a few times for other complete lies.
there’s some instructions in there on how to remove all information that adsense has on you and your browsing history. After doing that i was flooded with ads for dating sites that had porn videos playing over them at a light transparency. Others have been less subtle. Reporting it at best well make it so you stop seeing the ad after a few months but everyone else still does.
I’ll just pop back over to an open source solution.
Bragging is subjective.
Some take my bitching and moaning that I was up all night working on ____ because the project is a complete mess and they wanted it today as “bragging”.
Its performance review time, i hate myself and rent is expensive.
My time management is poor because my project managers is even worse
This worked thank you
I mean I just get headaches when games do it too much.
I 100% agree with accessibility features. This includes some of the newer considerations.
I once saw a thing where a DM (D&D) had an anonymous survey of common sensitive topics. He’d gage what his players where comfortable with prior to starting a campaign and adjust the story accordingly. Games just need this.
Oh I never heard that one before. Well I learned a new thing then.
“Tiny rump faction of extremist” is an amazing typo
Oh goodie more pain
I’m guessing this isn’t going to be as good as rent and house prices plummeting is it?
So who replaces him then? A more obedient puppet?
Now how much did they spend on marking this donation?
That whould definitely alter my speculations. Assuming we actually hear about anything said during this closed session.
Of course he could walk into the closed meeting room emit a loud 23 second fart, then leave without a word. If the public isn’t privvy to what happens in that meeting he can claim to have said whatever he wants and never get disproven.
I have a few interpretations if this based on my limited understanding if it.
I think the oversite committee has to hear him out. Ignoring a complaint from multiple members of military about potential misappropriation of funding would be egregious on their part. So they are listening to everything and trying to be professional about it.
Now the cynic in me believes this is actually a genius way to push pulp. If this guy writes a book (assuming he hasn’t already) he’s just given himself enormous credibility and advertising at little to no cost. Loud enough to be heard but vague enough that he can’t be disproven or take on any accountability.
But the conspiracy theorist in me just sees this as an attempt to discredit and humiliate this and other sub committee’s. Ammo that can be used to try and shut it down or prevent them from more serious work.
Though I’m a Candain and only getting bits and pieces of this story so I’m probably way off base here.
Should I bother reporting these at this point?
If you really wanted to make him mad you’d have left the damn thing blank.
These are just adding threads to his golden parachute.
Now if we could somehow get LinkedIn. It will be the last core of evil pro corporatism.
Still shocked they kicked out Pluto over a doping scandal.