![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Lol, I read that he left a leach indicating the city he lived in, and the police figured the rest out.
Lol, I read that he left a leach indicating the city he lived in, and the police figured the rest out.
What was the clue?
In biology we call it limb autonomy.
Okay, so conservative and revisionist, but not imperialist. Maybe imperial-adjacent. Thanks for the deets.
Ah, so he protected them from being prosecuted or something?
My understanding is the murder’s family was ruined by donating to the church. The murderer wrote.that.he planned to kill the church leader,.but changed.his mine cause Abe was more famous and would get more attention. I don’t think there is evidence that the murderers motivations were political, but I could be wrong. Happen to have a source?
I don’t know what this means.
I wouldn’t call him imperialist either. I think he was a pretty decent leader for Japan. He wasn’t murdered for his politics, but because of his religious affiliation.
Why was he imperialist?
I bet you navy exercises had something to do with it.
Not my claim that it’s new, I copy pasted the article
Tl;dr: A new filing in a lawsuit brought by the families of 9/11 victims against the government of Saudi Arabia alleges that al-Qaeda had significant, indeed decisive, state support for its attacks. Officials of the Saudi government, the plaintiffs’ attorneys contend, formed and operated a network inside the United States that provided crucial assistance to the first cohort of 9/11 hijackers to enter the country.
Yeah, I had heard that too and eventually looked up the research paper and it’s bs, lil. It’s pretty much an academic paper just saying maybe they do and someone should look into it… No actual results. Not the paper fault - media spinned it.
Read the whole paper though. It has percentages. Just sayin
I read it, it’s from 2013
For the record, people claim that cat purring cures things (heals bones, for example). This is not true. There is a published academic paper claiming it, I read it, tldr it’s total garbage.
Not true. Pet cats are about a third of the problem, according to a 2013 nature paper. Feral populations vary a lot by location - some places have almost no ferals but lots of pet cats.
Ahhhhhh! Yes, that’s it, thanks!
I think I remember seeing it on TV? Like in the early 90s?
Did you watch the video?