No it fucking isn’t

I’ve got quite a smart ring, but I didn’t pay for it, it was just there

Yeah I tried it and it fell over ***

BRIOCHE IS CAKE

a journalist YouTuber

You may only pick one of these

Shit-stirring, attention-seeking cunt is more likely

“Help help I’m being oppressed”

Fucksake man, will you PLEASE think of the shareholders

So you can find all this information out by reading a bit more of the MBFC report?

Cool, I’ll do that, and get a slightly more objective opinion than I would’ve got, and make my own decisions about the source.

You continue barking at the moon like a leaded-petrol-huffing yank 😂

Strange person!

MBFC rating for Breitbart -

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as numerous false claims.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks Bias Rating: RIGHT Factual Reporting: MIXED Country: USA Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

And MBFC rating for the Guardian -

LEFT-CENTER BIAS

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

Overall, we rate The Guardian as Left-Center biased based on story selection that moderately favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks over the last five years.

Detailed Report

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER Factual Reporting: MIXED Country: United Kingdom MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Newspaper Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY History

I think they’re doing their job reasonably well. It’s up to you whether you read the actual links or not

Have you tried changing your news sources from gutter-tabloids to something a bit better?

As an island, we’re extremely good at insulting entire nations. We try not to though, because we’re not actually cunts.

Where are you insulting us from, and I’ll try to be nice

From what I read, the pharmaceutical companies have been on this like a tramp on a sandwich, right from the beginning.

I think you just haven’t realised that you’re the racist

I think this is an advert

John Richard here is definitely an American. He doesn’t understand the difference between “free speech” and “freedom from hatred”

Those of us in truly modern countries enjoy the latter and are very happy to have it.

It’s a common thing in backward-thinking, religious countries to think that the former is better.

You sound like you get your knowledge of European and British laws from tabloid journalism

Maybe I had weird friends but for us it was Colin McRae Rally 2

For those reading, this is The Telegraph

Their whole fan base, as it were, is old Tories (conservatives) and angry old racists

Just fucking ignore it and don’t give them clicks

New request for Lemmy devs - the ability to block any post with Japanese cartoons

So they were bolted to the ground, but not the wall? Is this why you weren’t doing an engineering major? ☺️

I don’t have this problem because I have Windows snort