That’s interesting. You have an url handy for now details? Even if this wasn’t the case, fossil generation isn’t real feasible for us anyway.
That’s interesting. You have an url handy for now details? Even if this wasn’t the case, fossil generation isn’t real feasible for us anyway.
TIL. But I’m not convinced that this would solve the problem for good. But it certainly helps with growth.
Yes, however the article lists it as a power source (of course it’s great for building if possible) hence I’m looking at that aspect only. It’s more suitable for heating, however, again, at scale it would be problematic (at that’s not even a big one) plus emissions are not healthy. If you ignore emissions and use it for heating of few areas here and there (like it is a trend with pellets), taking into account growth rate, it could be a renewable I suppose.
That certainly helps, but still, at scale is hardly sustainable.
If you look at it like that, fossil is renewable as well. Just a tiny bit slower, but still, given enough time … :)
Sure, that’s all nice. However at what scale is that sustainable? Also burning wood yields all sorts of fine particles, not just CO2, which are not good for humans. Plus we are reducing forests at global level. Can you imagine the forest area for providing power to a whole city?
Is biomass renewable, though? I mean it takes a lot of time for a tree to grow. A lot.
Yep, some even mention op to 95% if I recall correctly. Hopefully it gets only better. But I really wish batteries would come with recycling specs and clear EOL process. Like mandatory.
Sadly no useful numbers in the article, like how much of a battery gets recycled and stuff.
Hm, no words about real efficiency compared to existing tech nor reciclability and other less important factors than 1,000x better efficiency.
I’m waiting for info about A language now.
Seems like Qualcomm is getting there. Latest generation is not bad, though battery usage seems still a not-so-brilliant (according to early reviews).
OTOH one gets Holly C, so it might be worth.
On the bright side, ARM is getting there, plus there is RISC-V that is rising as well, but it still has some road ahead.
But aren’t both the same speedwise?
It’s primarily about safety, not speed. Any C or C++ program should match the speed but not the correctness.
Hey, no worries. It’s interesting how nature changes.