All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0
I subconsciously tried wiping my screen.
Thank you for the apology 😊 I can understand how my post could’ve been construed as being lazy.
??? Why don’t you tap it and see.
I did try that. Nothing appeared to happen, or change on my end; however, I now realize what the issue was. The first thought that I had, when I first noticed that Icon, was actually the exact same as that which you said; it just never occured to me that I could be on the same instance as the comments in question. So, when I tried clicking that icon, I was clicking it on a post that was from Lemmy.world – the same instance that I am on. As such, I noticed no change in the displayed content – the page would appear to load, but nothing would actually change. This is, of course, to be expected – I just didn’t put 2 and 2 together. I apologize if my inquiry seemed lazy, or thoughtless.
As an aside, In my defence, the UI also doesn’t necessarily tell you what the icon does. If you hover your mouse over it, you will see the following:
Imo “link” isn’t exactly descriptive, as to the button’s purpose.
likely will cause issues at some point
What sort of issues?
It appears that I do have the “Show context” button (granted it’s a little hard to notice at first), but it appears to not be functioning properly. I just tested it in this thread by clicking “Show context” for this comment, and instead of showing me this comment, as I would expect, it instead showed me this comment.
Can you see if a moderator has removed comments from a thread?
Yes, but it involves sorting through the community modlog.
I wonder if this feature could be implemented – it would just be another sorting option in comment sections – assuming that the server actually stores this data.
Can you see the content of the removed comments?
No. Not even mods/admins can.
From what I can see in the modlog, it appears that you can see the content of comments, but just not the content of posts. It seems to treat comments as post titles in the log. What’s also weird is that they have links associated with them which appear to point at nothing. Perhaps they are supposed to point to the original comment/post?
Are moderators able to specify motive for the specific removal?
Yes, but to be honest, I have no idea where that reason goes or who it is visible to
It looks like you can see it underneath the removed item in a little bit of text that states “Reason”, and then the reasoning.
Go to filter by action and choose “removing comments”
That’s only within the modlog, though. I’m talking about withint the comment thread for a post. As I stated:
Also, can you see mod removals within a comment thread? Or is it only in the modlog that you can see removals?
You wont be able to see any reply context?
EDIT: Upon testing here, it appears not. That makes it rather unuseable, does it not?
Cool! However, while it does show the full log of removals, it appears that I can’t see the original content of the post – I can only see that a post with a title was removed. Also, can you see mod removals within a comment thread? Or is it only in the modlog that you can see removals?
Flatpak – It’s not without it’s own issues, of course, but it does the job. I’m not fan of how snaps are designed, and I don’t think canonical is trustworthy enough to run a packaging format. Appimages are really just not good for widespread adoption. They do what they are designed to do well, but I don’t think it’s wide to use them as a main package format.
I’ve heard that ReFS is supposedly replacing NTFS, on Windows.
For your reference, please see the updated post. I ran a S.M.A.R.T test, and the drive is indeed borked.
Thank you very much for all of the extra information!
I ran a S.M.A.R.T short test, and, yeah, the hard drive is quickly dying:
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED!
Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA.
Failed Attributes:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 001 001 051 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 1473
That disk certainly isn’t healthy.
For my own future knowledge, what, exactly, in the logs, led you to that conclusion?
image the whole thing with ddrescue
Since you mention “image”, I’m assuming that I would need a drive at least equal to the size of the source drive to store the image? The issue is that the source drive is 2TB in size, so I would need to source another 2TB drive (at least) to store the image.
Unfortunately, I am unable to downgrade to LTS. I need the latest kernel version for a my WiFi card (I’ve had a ton of annoying driver issues with this specific card that seem to now be fixed in the latest few kernel updates).
Nothing logged.
I have the exact same issue. I’ve never been able to see any errors in the logs. Essentially just says “going to sleep” then that’s it.
Using Nvidia with closed source drivers by chance?
No, I have an AMD GPU.
some hardware specs might help others with assisting you.
Noted! I’ll update the post.
Next time I would post on !homelab@lemmy.ml
Thank you for letting me know!
What I like about the Gadsden flag, as opposed to this one – according to how I interpret it, anyways – is that it advocates for the use of one’s voice before violence. The main symbol on the Gadsden flag is a timber rattlesnake. If you think about such a rattlesnake in nature, when you get too close to them, or provide them with a reason to feel wary, or uncomfortable they won’t immediately attack you, but will instead provide you with an auditory, nonviolent warning. It’s only when one ignores their warnings, and continues to harass the snake, or give them a reason to think that they are under immediate threat of harm that they will fight back, and will not hesitate to do so. In all other circumstances, the rattlesnake will mind it’s own business, and let you do the very same. I find this behaviour admirable of a creature, and it is, in my opinion, the true ethos of libertarianism. The Canada goose, on the other hand, won’t hesitate to harass you. they will routinely attack people just relaxing in a park. They provide little warning to someone that they find threatening, and will often choose to immediately strike out. This is not behaviour that should be emulated, or admired, in my opinion.