I could imagine Labour HQ running their own Lemmy server for their MPs and staff.
I could imagine Labour HQ running their own Lemmy server for their MPs and staff.
It really depends how well maintained the instances are. This extra work may come at a cost. Which may exclude some of the opportunists.
You could argue that’s what industry-millitary complex is already doing. Along with the media.
While I agree with you, at what stage would you find a job just not worth the carnage?
I looked at it and despaired how intertwined Israel is in the global economy. A full boycott will be a real sacrifice. You’d be surprised how wide ranging their influence is.
The real question is do we have enough access to cheap green tech? A further, more probing question is: what are we willing to sacrifice to get it? Potential things on the chopping block:
As to the last one, as the recent pandemic showed, consolidating manufacturing to one country/area can make the global economy quite fragile to economic, environmental, societal and political shocks.
I was referring to their power base. If there was no cultural pain there, there would be nothing to exploit to remain in power so that they an perpetrate this atrocity.
Also known as “a cycle of violence”. Or " hurt people, hurt people" But at what stage is it someone’s responsibility to break this most vicious of cycles?
I wonder how they measured this. Could it just be that they get more utilisation? Even per capita is probably not adequate either. You would need a measure that’s an analogue of per capita. Maybe per result? For instance I could spend half an hour attempting to get just the right set of keywords to bring up the right result, or I could spend 5 minutes in a chat session with an AI honing the correct response.
… And? A lot of socialists are also libertarian in equal measure.
I think you could just remove “trades” from that caption. Bloody prima donas.
A few questions:
Without these questions answered, it’s hard to make out what to think about this statistic.
As the saying goes: “lies, damned lies, and statistics”.
As it is, It would have been more useful if they allowed respondents a selection of choices. Such as: Don’t Know/Care, Neutral, About Right and Not Enough.
Maybe a meta study would have made a better subject for an article.
Let’s see if the other Republicans can turn it 'round. The recent trajectory of the party has not been promising, though.
I wonder what’s different here. Israel has danced over the US’s red lines before with such alacrity that they may as well have been an invitation. “I wasn’t gonna, but you drew a red line there. Oh I can’t resist.”
I think shooting foreign troops would be seen as an escalation. And I don’t think Europe wants to see where that will go.
I don’t think it’s that empty. GOP will be back in power some day.
It’s only a matter of time and how long can they hold a grudge.
Something’s a bit iffy with this story. Surely, Germany would have made clear the particulars of the ban to Abu-Sitta. If this is the case, is this just a consciousness raising stunt on by Abu-Sitta? If he did know there are ways around the ban. Could it be that he isn’t Schengen banned at all and France is using it as a pretext.
If the Palestinians show anything, no justice, no peace comes to mind. Say Brown does this assuming the fire is still there, people won’t stay silent for long. If a party chooses the path of the authoritarian they need to carry a pretty big stick. And even then, as Israel keeps showing, it doesn’t work.
How powerful a tool X is depends on how much legitimacy it can gain. If politicians are leaving the platform it can’t be long before advertisers also leave. I’m old enough to remember Myspace. Even Facebook is a bit pacé nowadays.