How is dismissing a correction with a blunt “nope” nice and tacking on etymology when we’re talking about modern use of the word?
How is dismissing a correction with a blunt “nope” nice and tacking on etymology when we’re talking about modern use of the word?
Yeah what kind of linguistics dweeb doesn’t understand that language is fluid and shapes with time and location.
Well, civil wars between citizens and cops.
Emotions motivate everyone.
It’s insulting and counter productive to say this thing is about dumb people following their emotions when education, money and opportunities play such a big part.
It’s also worth giving them the benefit of a doubt. It might be just a bug or an oversight.
I don’t see how player data even would be worth risking GDPR fines. But at least you don’t have to worry about it.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) gives individuals the right to ask for their data to be deleted and organisations do have an obligation to do so, except in the following cases:
- the personal data your company/organisation holds is needed to exercise the right of freedom of expression;
- there is a legal obligation to keep that data;
- for reasons of public interest (for example public health, scientific, statistical or historical research purposes).
You can’t delete your account if you’re banned? Seems a bit iffy.
Yeah, might. It’s good good to question it even if that’s the case. Maybe next time someone will think twice about doing something similar if it’s not consensual.
At worst this doesn’t convert anyone. Then you can count up from there. And it also vocalizes support, which might come across as pandering but that’s about it.
I’m don’t to see how this article is bad for anyone. At most, mildly annoying because “we knew that already”.
Mint flavored all the way through, baybeh!
Yeah. I looove the diarrhea I get from eating tubes of mint toothpaste.
Bitching about people switching to more dangerous substances makes the case to legalize it, nothing more.
It makes more sense to think about it like that.
Did I say that somewhere?
And calling review bombers reviewers, like they offer legitimate unique criticism is kinda funny too.
Because they took OW1, changed very little, made it a lot more microtransactiony, didn’t release a promised co-op mode that basically was the reasoning to release OW2. I’m sure there’s more but that’s about it.
For sure, agreed. Major downgrade and when I tried it at launch it still had the same queue problems OW1 had so not like they even fixed anything for a casual player.
But I’m pretty sure we both know Overwatch 2 isn’t the worst game available. (I’m not going to go out of my way defend OW2 to anyone, it’s not worth it.)
Yeah these review bombings are ridiculous, so what? Am I not free to express my opinion? And I’m not quite sure how anyone’s not allowed to have their opinion, if it’s dumb then you can call it dumb.
People are voicing their opinions, what’s the big deal? We should all agree with these gamer tantrums?
I’m not s fan but if you really think it’s the worst game on Steam woof…
Microsoft is a good underdog because they have infinite money. And a really bad market leader, I bet worse than Sony. It would’ve been way better for the industry to not let them acquire the big boys they have.