![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Summarising is one specific use of llms that doesn’t actually work.
Summarising is one specific use of llms that doesn’t actually work.
Biters want one thing and it’s disgusting
I think you really need to go look up what “extra judicial” means.
Also, you notice the quote doesn’t mention America at all? You seem to be of the very Angry Americans so perhaps you’re not aware but one UK citizen who has been convicted for this before, and founded a now banned organisation that existed to start these kinds of fights, was tweeting incitement from Cyprus (where he had gone to avoid yet another court appearance)
To anyone in the UK the quote you’ve given says “Tommy Robinson is gonna get nicked”
That’s a lot of words, why are you writing about libel and not writing about inciting riots?
Extra judicial what now?
If you’re claiming the head UK police officer said he’d kidnap people off the street of a foreign country like the fuckong CIA you’ve made a mistake.
Probably from reading too much crap on twitter
It only takes three EU countries to beat 40 gold
I got to 70 before getting bored.
He’s a hippie who likes talking to plants. There’s a quote from thatcher implying the problem with the royals is they’d be SDP voters.
Sure they head the church and military but associating them with the right isn’t really accurate
Genociding yourself is an internal matter, even if you invade first so it becomes part of your country and then start the genociding.
Naming no names. You know who
police prosecutions in the UK are done very quietly, I’m not sure why but you’re lucky to get one small story in the newspapers for even quite horrific crimes. There are perhaps not enough, but they do happen more than people generally think.
If I were in Iran’s position I wouldn’t be too happy about a road into central Asia for tanks to race down and a rail line to resupply them.
We’re also not rejoining the customs union because he ruled that out too. He can do a little here but it is just a little.
Italy had a bit of a say in it…
The only mass tourism outside cities is Disney world. Only cities are big enough for mass tourism
Did they also mistranslate the Chinese women commenting on trailers that the studio is gross and don’t want women playing their game?
It’s honestly tragic, if you read that article it’s primarily about the Chinese game industry culture with one game and studio used as an example because it’s a supposedly a AAA game to rival western studios.
We’re being asked to believe ign has slandered a large Chinese studio, entirely made up, and kept the article up regardless. It just doesn’t hold water. Harrassing some poor women off social media and writing long comments about everything being made up is easy, but ign are still standing by the article six months after it was published.
There are so many outlandish claims in this comment with basically nothing backing it up
This 100%
I deleted my reply because it was too much but the original ign article on wukong is very tame. I can’t see why they’re so worked up to harass the author off the internet.
Some days beehaw not having downvotes is a real issue.
I was about to start mouth foaming, but got to the end of the name distant worlds:universe
If anyone is giving these a go make absolutely certain you’re not buying distant worlds 2 by mistake.
Star ruler as an disappointment is fair, but have you tried the totally different and now open sourced StarRuler2?
It’s a much better game, much tighter with a definite progress path for colonies shipping things to each other (later used by slipstream which is more pure management and might not fit your list)
It’s free, it’s worth a try I promise it’s very different to SR
The precedent would be you have to explicitly say what you’re going to do in the first vote.
Every single person in the campaign was “oh we’d never leave the single market” and when that became an option afterwards it needed a new referendum.
It’s worth reading the article, and better articles are available in the UK press too.
The coverup came from ignorance, no one actually knew this was happening but the NHS staff had reason to reassure patients and just assumed everything was ok without looking hard.
NHS management also didn’t look.
When ministers tried to ask about it they got told everything was fine by their civil servants. And so they go out and tell the press everything is fine.
No one can start an investigation for the suspicions because it looks like admitting it’s happening, and they genuinely didn’t know it was. Because there had been no investigation.
“Standing back and viewing the response of the NHS and of government, the answer to the question ‘was there a cover-up?’ is that there has been. Not in the sense of a handful of people plotting in an orchestrated conspiracy to mislead, but in a way that was more subtle, more pervasive and more chilling in its implications. To save face and to save expense, there has been a hiding of much of the truth,” Langstaff wrote.
“Over decades successive governments repeated lines to take that were inaccurate, defensive and misleading. Its persistent refusal to hold a public inquiry, coupled with a defensive mindset that refused to countenance that wrong had been done, left people without answers, and without justice. This has also meant that many people who are chronically ill have felt obliged to devote their time and their energies to investigating and campaigning, often at great personal cost.”
I find it extremely difficult to believe two events over 70 years apart that I know are very different in many ways could ultimately have the same underlying cause.
And as you haven’t actually made a point, just asserted they do, there’s no reason to believe they do. LLM or not