If these answers are not provided, the claim then undergoes further review, which extends the time a winner must wait in order to receive their prize.
So the prize was delayed, not denied. Misleading headlines like this really make it difficult to trust the source.
Odd response. I am curious to know what reportable offense OP thinks I committed.
You seemed really confused why somebody would be upset about 8,000 dead children and also stated that you were “happy” about the updated numbers.
You are “happy” about 8,000 dead children?
Today, under 5,000 women and 8,000 children are now officially listed by the UN as casualties.
Is that supposed to be the good news?
Some refrigerators can dispense cold filtered water.
I’ve got my Plex server running on an Intel NUC 8 with 2 USB 2TB solid state drives serving as local storage for my media.
OMG! IT’S HAPPENING! My natural talents, which I have been diligently practicing and honing my entire life are finally given a chance to be properly recognized!
I would think that providing an echo chamber for an existing belief would make somebody less inclined to consider alternative view points. Further, I would suspect social media could sway people still undecided on issues. We’ve already seen reports on how Facebook deliberately manipulated the feeds for certain people to encourage either positive or negative emotional responses to a subject.
Couldn’t those impacts be seen as fueling division and polarization?
“non-human” is not the same as “non-terrestrial”. We’ve shot a lot of non-human “biological material” into space.
When all your stress and worries melt away.
Yeah 🙁 Sadly we had no ham, bacon, or any other pork products in the house.
Ah yes. He was really on fire back in the day. Got a lot of attention for a while and then, almost overnight, it was like he and his most devoted fans were just gone from this world.
There are laws against it in the US.
From the article:
Two officials from the US Justice Department’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section told The Washington Post that AI-generated images depicting “minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct” are illegal under at least two US laws.
One law “makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene.” The other law “defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor,” including “computer-generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor.”
Just gonna leave this here
https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/ceos/mike-lindell-net-worth/