![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
So is this an actual Dragon Age game? An RPG like the original games?
Or is this an overwatch clone dancing on the corpse of the IP?
So is this an actual Dragon Age game? An RPG like the original games?
Or is this an overwatch clone dancing on the corpse of the IP?
I had an absolute blast with the farsight gun. But honestly, if they bring it back, I hope they nerf the fuck out of it. Because kids online will be fucking insufferable with it.
Back then, you were playing with your friends in the same room. If one of your friends was being a douche and griefing with it, you could just slap them.
The tough part to recreate is that the multiplayer was so fun because it was innovative. It was one of the first games to do stuff like that.
24 years later, we’ve had a lot of games do a lot of stuff as well.
… But I’d still happily enjoy bringing all of it back, even if it was just a cosmetic facelift.
I can agree that there will always be subtle variations in textures of different substances, but I can guarantee you that we can affect the texture of a mixed product by altering the ingredients.
I’ve been managing restaurants for decades, with a few Italian places under my belt with Michelin star chefs. One restaurant group featured a rotating list that always had at least a dozen different meatballs.
I’ve seen them tweak all kinds of recipes, with all kinds of meats and grains. Beef, chicken, pork, lamb, goat, venison, even fuckin gator (which was Delicious!). I’ve also sold eggplant, chickpea, spinach, Beyond, Impossible, all kinds of shit in ball form.
I’ve seen these chefs tweak a recipe that uses the same volume of meat, crumbs, and other ingredients, to yield significantly different textures and flavors, just by playing with how they prep those ingredients. How finely they dice/chop/prep the same amount of an ingredient affects the texture.
How they prep the crumbs matters. What bread do they use, what’s it made of, how it was cooked before it crumbled, how finely it was crumbled, what seasonings were used that will bind with the fats and proteins from the meat.
All of this matters and all of it affects the flavor and texture. This isn’t just cooking, it’s materials science. Give it a little more credit.
That’s just a current problem. There’s no reason to assume it won’t also be resolved eventually.
Also, mixing plant matter into meat products is nothing new. For example, most meatballs have breadcrumbs in them.
Fun hyperbole, but this all assumes wolves are the only predators.
Nah it’s still the wolf’s fault, even when the shepherd is terrible. Take the wolf out of the equation, and the sheep live regardless of the shepherd’s capabilities.
Oh wow, that looks absolutely delicious!
I’m okay with that.
Yeah it’s getting pretty uncivil in these comments. Sorry, op, comments are getting locked.
Cute photo though, it’s an old school meme.
I dunno, my dude. That’s still quite a reach to go from a simple question to automatically determining that it’s a hatchet job.
I’m not saying you’re wrong, just that you’re assuming a lot more than I normally works from a singular question.
There’s a significant difference between the two questions in your first sentence: quality of verifiability. The goal here is to determine accuracy anyways. Asking that directly will never get you an answer that you should accept at face value.
If I ask “is this accurate?”, any sourceless responses lack weight. “yes” holds as much proof as “no.”
But “has anyone heard of this” is a much lower barrier of veracity. Answers themselves won’t determine the accuracy of the article, just whether or not anyone can help establish credibility.
It’s important to question and verify sources, no matter who it is. Criticizing someone who does makes you no better than anyone pushing propaganda.
What is a problem is fake news.
Indeed. That’s why that user asked the simple question. They’re trying to determine the veracity of the information from that website.
Bias and factuality are different concepts. One source can print wildly biased, yet probably true information. While another can provide absolutely unbiased disinformation.
That looks delicious, nicely done!
Brilliant. Someone needs to shop Cousin It from Addam’s Family onto the right side to make this a masterpiece.
Tell you what. You’ve proven enough to be a human being, so I would’ve left it as is and moved on. But your subsequent comments are sufficiently rude enough to necessitate some action. Feel free to try again in a week with a more respectful demeanor.
This is a chill sub for humans to post their actual food. It doesn’t need any disrespect or hate in here.
Op, you’ve been reported for ai spam, which is something I’m not too keen on having in this community. To give you the benefit of the doubt, please respond to this post within a day with an explanation of just what the hell Araffed means.
Thanks.
Don’t you dare. We shall die on this carb-loaded hill.
Indeed, the most common method is the “gassing” but there are brands that actually use a dye made from vegetable extract. I just used dyeing in the sense of providing color alteration through artificial means.
Well that’s awesome! Thanks!