Just to clarify, the one that said that is actually one of the oldest far right parties in the country, not one of those that just popped up.
Just to clarify, the one that said that is actually one of the oldest far right parties in the country, not one of those that just popped up.
All pizzas are pies.
And do you seriously think that someone with minimal modding knowledge can “fix” texture compression
Yes, better textures are consistently one of the first mods to come out for every game they have released since Fallout 3.
What exactly is the utility of the above quote of yours then?
To show that the correlation is spurious at best.
Has it become even more successful after he’s mellowed out?
Yes, it has. Usage of Linux has been growing over the years.
My point is exactly that. It’s not obvious, and as such you can’t attribute the success of Linux to his behaviour. Like the OP said, there’s no logic in looking at something successful and picking a singular thing to be responsible.
How is that obvious? Especially because it’s become even more successful after he’s mellowed out?
The analogy is that the end result doesn’t justify the behaviour from the person in power. It’s apt.
Of course it is. A square is also a rectangle but it’s still an important distinction.
But did it work because of the style or in spite of it? No reason to believe it wouldn’t be even more successful if he had been less abrasive like he is now.
It’s not a comparison, it’s an analogy. Important distinction.
Well, in that case, nobody cares about what you want to say, either.
There’s a few single player focused ones released in the past decade. Deserts of Kharak comes to mind.
And yet Verdun, Tannenberg, and Isonzo are some of the most fun multiplayer FPS games around.
socialist prime minister
That’s a bit of a stretch, he may be Socialist Party, but most of the policies of his government have been practically neoliberal.
Always upvote Feynman. Got me through some tough times in undergrad.
Quantum mechanics didn’t supersede electromagnetism. Again, they’re different things. Electromagnetism is a fundamental interaction. Whereas quantum mechanics describes the mechanics of quantum particles. Whether those particles are affected by electromagnetic forces or not. It’s a description of how they behave at quantum scales.
Coulomb’s law has nothing to do with quantum mechanics, it’s a description of how macroscopic charged particles interact. What the OP should have said to be correct is:
Awesome to see the similarities between: Newton’s law of gravitation and Coulomb’s law
I don’t know where he got quantum mechanics from.
They’re different things. The OP means electromagnetism, Coulomb’s law has nothing to do with quantum mechanics, it’s classical physics.
The relation between them is that they’re both forces that scale with the inverse square of the distance between the objects. Any force that scales with the inverse square of distance has pretty much the same general form.
Another similarity is that both are incomplete, first approximations that describe their respective forces. The more complete versions are Maxwell’s laws for electromagnetism and General Relativity for gravity.
Same for me. I don’t understand why, I should love it but I don’t.