![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eb9cfeb5-4eb5-4b1b-a75c-8d9e04c3f856.png)
The CEO said they were going to add pay-walled subreddits at an earnings call.
So… Yep.
I made LASIM! https://github.com/CMahaff/lasim
I currently have 3 accounts (big shock):
The CEO said they were going to add pay-walled subreddits at an earnings call.
So… Yep.
Wouldn’t this be the equivalent of the mob mailing their own finger?
Out of curiosity, what switch are you using for your setup?
Last time I looked, I struggled to find any brand of “home tier” router / switch that supported things like configuring vlans, etc.
Maybe I am not thinking of the access control capability of VLANs correctly (I am thinking in terms of port based iptables: port X has only incoming+established and no outgoing for example).
I think of it like this: grouping several physical switch ports together into a private network, effectively like each group of ports is it’s own isolated switch. I assume there are routers which allows you to assign vlans to different Wi-Fi access points as well, so it doesn’t need to be literally physical.
Obviously the benefits of vlans over something actually physical is that you can have as many as you like, and there are ways to trunk the data if one client needs access to multiple vlans at once.
In your setup, you may or may not benefit, organizationally. Obviously other commenters have pointed out some of the security benefits. If you were using vlans I think you’d have at a minimum a private and public vlan, separating out the items that don’t need Internet access from the Internet at all. Your server would probably need access to both vlans in that scenario. But certainly as you say, you can probably accomplish a lot of this without vlans, if you can aggressively setup your firewall rules. The benefit of vlans is you would only really need to setup firewall rules on whatever vlan(s) have Internet access.
I loved the original Hades, but I played it after it left Early Access.
It’s going to be really hard to resist jumping in early with Hades II.
I ran into the same thing. I’ve always just worked around it, but I believe I did find the solution at one point (can’t find the link now).
But if I am remembering right, I believe you need to manually create a bridge between the two networks - by default it isolates the VMs from TrueNAS itself for security reasons.
Sorry I can’t link the exact fix right now, but hopefully this will help you Google the post I found on the subject.
Simple thing, but are you sure you mounted the NFS share as NFSv4? I don’t have access to a machine to check right now, but I think it might default to mounting NFSv3, even if both sides support v4.
To add on to this answer (which is correct):
Your “of” can also just be a regular file if that’s easier to work with vs needing to create a new partition for the copy.
I’ll also say you might want to use the block size parameter “bs=” on “dd” to speed things up, especially if you are using fast storage. Using “dd” with “bs=1G” will speed things up tremendously if you have at least >1GB of RAM.
That link seems to 404. I will IM you shortly.
Sure thing.
Do you get any additional information in your error log?
If not, would you be open to running a version with additional debugging statements to help identify the cause of the failures?
I know there is an issue when .world is overloaded where this happens, but if it’s happening constantly it has to be something specific with your account vs mine.
LASIM author here - there does not appear to be any API changes in 0.18.4, and it seemed to work fine with my testing.
I’ve updated the table on the Github README to reflect this.
There is nothing built into Lemmy, though there is at least one active PR working on it.
In the meantime I made this tool: https://github.com/CMahaff/lasim
It copies subscriptions, blocks, and some profile settings.
There are others too if you search for them.
Your concern is valid because there does seem to be an existing bug that if you do get denied, that username is forever blocked: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1096
Glad that wasn’t the case here.
No I think you’re right and I’m wrong, it does appear to work that way.
My confusion came from the beehaw de-federation with lemmy.world and it seemed like at one point traffic was a one-way street, but if you go to a beehaw community now via lemmy.world vs from beehaw.org you can see that beehaw content is not arriving at at lemmy.world (because beehaw defederated them), even though lemmy.world has not defederated from beehaw.
Out of curiosity, what content are you looking for? Discovery on Lemmy can be a problem, but sometimes the communities are there and even active, just buried.
But may I also suggest searching by Top Day/12-hour/6-hour to see the most active posts. Lemmy’s scaled algorithm still doesn’t get it quite right IMO.