Heap sort sounds like the most useful cantrip ever
Heap sort sounds like the most useful cantrip ever
Binary search
Check bit
Control character
Sentinal value
Escape sequence
EDIT:
Git bisect (not sure if this one counts as computer sciency enough though)
Users are the acceptance testers.
Your redundant limbs and oversized heads are merely a weakness that natural selection has failed to weed out…until now
Didn’t downvote you but I’m guessing that’s covered by “Tea-ville” which could be why.
Government employee makes mistake, other employee corrects mistake, innocent family suffers minor inconvenience. Stay tuned for more.
Free me from this flesh, brother
Brain: Ok sure, oh btw by ‘morning’ you mean 3AM right?
Now I see you’re testing me, pushes me away
You’re a bit of a cunt aren’t you
What qualifies someone to be a judge is simply redefined to be what is popular. A judge should therefore no longer follow the law, but make the ruling most in line with what is popular. Under a voting system that is the sole qualifier.
Yes I agree, and just because there is a methodology doesn’t make the result not arbitrary. Can you explain what number four means? How do I assess it, what’s a 0, what’s a 5 and what’s a 10? How does number 2 relate to bias, isn’t that a factuality rating thing , why is it in the bias rubric? It’s a joke, each rating is totally arbitrary as there is no definition of what each one means beyond some vague description of the category. It’s essentially pick a number, feels based.
I have worked with qualitive rubrics before and this one is barely worthy of the name honestly. Two people could take this rubric away and come to completely opposite conclusions based on their own biases.
Hide ya cats, hide ya dogs…hide ya gerbils, ‘cause they eatin’ everybody out here
Biden: killing Americans in the west bank is totally unacceptable…but we will accept it.
The placement of the yellow dot is determined through a composite score derived from four distinct categories: Biased Wording/Headlines, Factual/ Sourcing, Story Choices, and Political Affiliation. Each category is rated on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0. indicating a lack of bias and 10 representing extreme bias. The average of these four scores is then plotted on the scale to indicate the source’s overall Left-Right bias.
I wouldn’t call picking four numbers 'a whole lot more ’ personally. If you actually read some of the bias analysis it becomes more obvious how arbitrary it is.
Thanks for clarifying, that makes sense now. I think from that perspective, MBFC in my mind is still useless because the why behind their rating is totally opaque, at least to me. I have read several of their analysis and their methodology and I just still have no idea why they give a certain rating. It feels more like a post hoc rationalisation than a process or set of criteria that was followed. Maybe it’s just me though, and it’s clearer for other folks.
How long has Russia been using foreign weapons on Ukranian soil now? Let’s get this fucking show on the road already!
Sounds like I’m just missing your point then. I don’t understand the relevance of the methodology if it doesn’t produce a useful rating beyond the subjective opinion someone would have given anyway, nor establish a coherent reason for the rating.
Absolutely incredible effort with how long it held and how many meat assaults it broke over the years.