I’m currently playing Diablo IV (and having a blast with it) but finding one small gripe which I only think is going to get worse and probably stop me playing it completely in the long run.

My girlfriend is currently pregnant. This means in 6 months time we’ll have a newborn. With this in mind I’m expecting to only be able to grab a few minutes at a time to game and even when I think I’ll have longer I may end up jumping off at short notice. This means I’ll almost certainly come to rely on games which I can pause. Unfortunately this isn’t possible with Diablo IV since it requires an always online connection even though I’m essentially playing it as a single player game.

What are other people’s thoughts?

  • Rhabuko@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Last month, construction workers did something in our street. I didn’t have Landline Internet for a whole week. Always Online is pretty horrible for single player games.

  • mek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It sucks, plain and simple. Single-player games should never require internet access, and if the game has a multiplayer component, it should be a separate mode that leaves the single-player mode working even when there is no internet connectivity.

    It’s just basic fucking common sense… except that it conflicts with financial interests and greed.

    • aTempUser@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes sense in that having a local single player and a multiplayer mode requires writing much of the game twice. Having a remote single player mode only requires making the game once, with a special instance spun up for each single player game.

      I live a life where I often don’t have a persistent connection. That means for me, I can’t play new games. While I have been a fan and player of Diablo since the first one I’ll have to sit this one out.

    • Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. If I’m gonna gave to get a pirate version in order for it to work, I’m donating to the crackers that fixed it, not the publishers that deliberately broke it.

  • lardasshardass@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a friend who lives in a dry cabin in Alaska. Only internet is a limited mobile hotspot. Games like Diablo 4 are pretty much off limits.

    I understand that some games can really benefit from being always online, but I think it’s important for games that can be played solo to have the offline option. The more choice the consumer has, the better.

  • Garrathian@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends on the game. Like if it’s an online only game, then of course that makes sense. But a single player game, or even a game with a single player mode requiring always online is and will always be dumb.

    Diablo 4 not being designed for offline solo play as well (like D2 and I think even D3 was) is annoying though.

  • jecht360@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I flat out refuse to buy games that require a constant internet connection. It’s annoying for multiplayer games but the need for always online with a single player game is ridiculous.

  • EnigmaNL@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my opinion all games that can be played solo should have an offline mode. Personally I have an excellent internet connection but I hate having to depend on servers to be able to play the game that I bought.

    The thing about always online is that the servers often crap out, especially during launch or during major patches. That just annoys the hell out of me.

  • thomasbeagle@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There seem to be two Diablo IV games.

    One is a single player or co-op offline RPG where you’re running around killing monsters and collecting loot so that you personally can save the world. Seeing other players running around just breaks the illusion.

    The other is some online multi-player thing where you can run around and team up with other people in the quest to min-max your build, where you pay stupid amounts of money to make your character look the same as all the other people who paid for the same skin.

    I like the first game, have no interest in the second, and I resent where the mechanics designed for the second game interfere with the first.

  • GiuEliNo@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate it I try to always avoid always online drm but sometimes it’s really impossible, i’m gonna be honest and say that i got some issue with my steamdeck for them. (f u ubisoft btw) So if i find that a singleplayer game needs an always online drm i just don’t buy it.

    • loops@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. I really loved the first two Diablos, but I wouldn’t touch the new one because of it. I’ll just wait a decade or so and emulate it.