• fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rust has exactly the same problems with depreciation as many Frameworks rely on experimental features which are subject to change.

    Rust has actually quite a good record with depreciation and backwards-compatibilty etc. They are changing the language in non-backwards compatible way over editions, but the changes are mostly very manageable.

    But to not end up being another C++ (syntax-wise it’s a disaster IMHO), a few non-backwards-compatible changes every few years are the way to go, when it’s manageable.

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What’s so confusing about C++ syntax exactly? To me it seems to make a lot of sense given the languages history.