Apple has a tendency to undercut this type of legislation by preempting it with options that are just barely good enough that 90% of users are satisfied. This way they can continue screwing over third party repair partners, the customers, and the planet, only ever doing just enough to not be forced to go all the way to doing it all right. They tightly control component availability, device schematics access, and more.
As long as they only wrong a minority, they can get away with it, because a majority has to be upset with them to force them right.
As for your need for a more damage resistant phone… An iPhone is never going to be it. It has always prioritized form over function in that regard. Modern phones only ever introduced water proofing and impact resistance, once it could be done without making them ugly or too large. Yet most people slap on a case anyway. If phones were made in a way that integrated the space taken up by a case into the actual device, making it larger and heavier, the case unnecessary in the first place, we could have it all. Case and point, caterpillar phones, and the old XCOVER Samsungs, which had swappable batteries, AND waterproofing.
If durability is a priority due to your need of always having a functioning mobile device, a user replaceable, even hot-swappable battery, is a boon, not a detriment. Your argument is self-contradictory.
As for your need for a more damage resistant phone… An iPhone is never going to be it. It has always prioritized form over function in that regard. Modern phones only ever introduced water proofing and impact resistance, once it could be done without making them ugly or too large. Yet most people slap on a case anyway.
I’ve run an iPhone without a case for the past 4.5 years. The only thing I’ve ever had to do was replace the battery. I don’t want an ugly or large phone, so the current designs and durability work great for me.
If phones were made in a way that integrated the space taken up by a case into the actual device, making it larger and heavier, the case unnecessary in the first place, we could have it all.
iPhones currently are made in a way that makes a case largely unnecessary for 99% of people.
Case in point, caterpillar phones, and the old XCOVER Samsungs, which had swappable batteries, AND waterproofing.
So those CAT phones are ugly as sin, and they don’t have an easily swappable battery. I’m not a CAT engineer, but it’s probably because they can’t get to the same IP ratings with one. After a quick search I’m seeing a fair amount of reviews complaining about the back cover of the XCover 6 popping off, and recommending a case for this already “ruggedized” device.
If durability is a priority due to your need of always having a functioning mobile device, a user replaceable, even hot-swappable battery, is a boon, not a detriment. Your argument is self-contradictory.
I don’t care about having to charge my phone, I care about my phone being damaged to the point of requiring repair. A hot-swappable battery isn’t a boon for me. I’ve had phones with hot-swappable batteries, and carrying them all around and keeping them charged up etc was definitely a detriment for me.
As I said before, my iPhone already has a user replaceable battery.
No. It doesn’t. It has a absolutely horrible design for repairability, which apple has desperately worked around to be able to claim they’ve done their due diligence, so they wont have to change how they design, make, and market products.
You main point is that in this case, we cannot have our cake and eat it too, but the only reason that’s true, is because the practices of modern device manufacturers choose not to develop products in that direction.
An yet, it can still be better.
Apple has a tendency to undercut this type of legislation by preempting it with options that are just barely good enough that 90% of users are satisfied. This way they can continue screwing over third party repair partners, the customers, and the planet, only ever doing just enough to not be forced to go all the way to doing it all right. They tightly control component availability, device schematics access, and more.
As long as they only wrong a minority, they can get away with it, because a majority has to be upset with them to force them right.
As for your need for a more damage resistant phone… An iPhone is never going to be it. It has always prioritized form over function in that regard. Modern phones only ever introduced water proofing and impact resistance, once it could be done without making them ugly or too large. Yet most people slap on a case anyway. If phones were made in a way that integrated the space taken up by a case into the actual device, making it larger and heavier, the case unnecessary in the first place, we could have it all. Case and point, caterpillar phones, and the old XCOVER Samsungs, which had swappable batteries, AND waterproofing.
If durability is a priority due to your need of always having a functioning mobile device, a user replaceable, even hot-swappable battery, is a boon, not a detriment. Your argument is self-contradictory.
I’ve run an iPhone without a case for the past 4.5 years. The only thing I’ve ever had to do was replace the battery. I don’t want an ugly or large phone, so the current designs and durability work great for me.
iPhones currently are made in a way that makes a case largely unnecessary for 99% of people.
So those CAT phones are ugly as sin, and they don’t have an easily swappable battery. I’m not a CAT engineer, but it’s probably because they can’t get to the same IP ratings with one. After a quick search I’m seeing a fair amount of reviews complaining about the back cover of the XCover 6 popping off, and recommending a case for this already “ruggedized” device.
I don’t care about having to charge my phone, I care about my phone being damaged to the point of requiring repair. A hot-swappable battery isn’t a boon for me. I’ve had phones with hot-swappable batteries, and carrying them all around and keeping them charged up etc was definitely a detriment for me.
As I said before, my iPhone already has a user replaceable battery.
No. It doesn’t. It has a absolutely horrible design for repairability, which apple has desperately worked around to be able to claim they’ve done their due diligence, so they wont have to change how they design, make, and market products.
You main point is that in this case, we cannot have our cake and eat it too, but the only reason that’s true, is because the practices of modern device manufacturers choose not to develop products in that direction.