• Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sure, the same way video games normalize stealing cars. Or the same way movies normalize killing people. I mean at some point you gotta stop blaming media.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I mean, Japan has had csam cartoons for decades. They have a lower CSA rate compared to the USA. Not saying it’s totally related, but it doesn’t seem like if someone has access to cartoon csam they will normalize it and do it in real life.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        People who downvoted you are lazy do a quick Google search on the topic.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      So if legalized porn reduces rapes as studies show, how to we figure out if this existing allows for less abuse to kids, or if it spawns long term interest

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Cartoon csam has been legal in Japan for decades. They have a lower CSA per Capita than the USA.

        There are some brain studies that show the area of the brain that is responsible for caring for children is butt up next to the part of the brain that is responsible for sexual pleasures. The study suggests that there might be a misfiring of the synapse between the different sides of the brain that might cause someone to be a pedo. These people don’t experience sexual pleasures without thinking about kids. It’s literally a disability.

        My opinion is that we don’t know if removing AI generated csam would make things worse for real life kids or not. But flat out banning it without proper research would be irresponsible.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Thanks for the thoughts on such, the way people were only downvoting originally and not providing any actual explanation to why, had me thinking it was just going to have been dumb to ask.

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          But flat out banning it without proper research would be irresponsible.

          I think the whole argument is moot. AI image generation is available to pretty much everyone. It’s impossible to control what what people are doing with it

            • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Self hosting is trivial these days. Any modern NVIDIA card and hundreds of models available online.