• SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Godel’s second theory of incompleteness states that a formal system cannot prove its own consistency

        I think that’s as close as you can get to “math is not objective”

        • affiliate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          before gödel’s theorems can be formally stated, you have to make a lot of assumptions about axioms, and you have to pick which kinds of logical rules are “valid”, etc. and that all feels way more dicey to me than the actual content of gödels theorems.

          i definitely agree that gödels theorems can help to undercut the idea that math is this all knowing, objective thing and there’s one right way to do everything. but to me personally, i feel like the stuff that’s very close to the foundations is super sketchy. there are no theorems at that level, it’s just “we’re going to say these things are true because we think they are probably true”.