+1 for the double entendre title 😄
Thanks, I was proud of that.
As well you should be 😄🤜
Pardon my ignorance - what’s ‘play with my nuts’ a reference to for Carter, aside from his gonads?
They made him put his family peanut farm in a blind trust so that he couldn’t benefit it during his time in office.
He was a peanut farmer.
Conspiracy theory time: maybe they hate old people…
😢
It’s for their safety. At that age the might build a sentient robot that votes for Trump who will then take away their social security. Thank you Lego, for responsible toy stewartship.
I find “LEGOs” very upsetting.
Lego is not an acronym. It does not usually get all-caps in prose, though the all-caps logotype is sometimes imitated in text.
Lego is a proper name, and is also used as a collective noun. It does not get pluralized.
“You can’t play with Lego anymore.”
Jackal.
LEGO is too an acronym. it stands for Leg Godt, Danish for “play well”
That’s…not an acronym. That’d just be LG.
what is it then?
It’s an abbreviation.
Not all abbreviations are acronyms, only the ones that take the first letter from each word. Lego takes two letters from each word, so it’s not an acronym.
On a similar note, some but not all acronyms are initialisms, if they’re spoken as the letters rather than the “word” they create.
FYI, DIY, PS are all initialisms, and also acronyms, and also abbreviations. ASAP, SCUBA, and LASER are acronyms and abbreviations, but not initialisms. Lego, appt, and st are all abbreviations but neither acronyms nor initialisms.
I always thought acronym is a subset of initialism, not the other way around.
I think the “correct” usage of acronym is only when it is spoken as a word. But language evolves and all that.
You can see the tension in the way MW defines it (including the extended description). Like: here’s the definition of the word, but some people use it when they actually mean initialism. This is in contrast to your more concise and cohesive definition of “[abbreviations] that take the first letter from each word”. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym
why is english like this… we just call it “shortening”.
Why does a language have different words for different concepts?
in my language we tend to use base words to broadly describe concepts, and combinations of words for more accuracy.
Lmao Legos adults
Language is flexible. Deal with it.
You called down the ire of practitioners of the dark arts known as prescriptivism.
fuck that. Lego is a company and I don’t need it to tell me how I can and cannot use their name. if they don’t like it they can suck my dick.
I really don’t understand why there are so many people passionate about how to “properly” use The Trademark™ in The Way that was Sanctioned by The Corporation®
just play with your Legos and get over it
Brought to you by the folks behind “Get Off That Nintendo and Go Outside” while you were PC gaming. Lol :p
I really don’t understand why there are so many people passionate about how to “properly” use The Trademark™ in The Way that was Sanctioned by The Corporation®
Actually, they are advocating against using it how the Lego company does. The Lego company uses LEGO in all caps.
I’m pretty sure the reason Lego isn’t supposed to be used is because they don’t want the trademark to be genericized. the all caps thing is stylization, I doubt they give a shit if you type it all caps or not.
I assume the people are passionate about grammar, and their corrections have nothing to do with respecting trademarks.
that’s even worse! especially because the vast majority of self proclaimed “grammar nazis” (really weird fucking title, guys) don’t know shit about linguistics as a science
obligatory Mitchell and Webb https://youtu.be/qmVnr7rsWrE
Legos is grammatically correct.
Which should be your original comment instead of the trademark thing.
no, I don’t care if it’s grammatically correct.
Great, doesn’t change the fact nobody is passionate about protecting trademarks as you are saying.
yes they are, because the word Legos has nothing to do with grammar
No, that’s Lego. Legos is a large metropolitan city in southwestern Nigeria.
no, that’s Lagos. Legos is a principle of rhetoric along with pathos and ethos.
It’s actually an angry shout
Lego deez nuts ha gottem
Hmm. Sorry bout that. What were we talking about?
Lego my eggo
you can never be too old for legos
You need to be between 4-99 years of age
Do YOU want to tell Jimmy Carter what he can and can’t play with?
I didn’t think so.
I would
What’s he gonna do? Beat me up?
This is how you get Isekai’s to the peanut farmer world.
“I Antagonized Jimmy Carter Over the Internet And Now I’m In Another World But I’m a Peanut That Farms and Also There’s A Demon King?!?!?!?!?!”
Totally underrated series that really picks up in Season 4.
He’s still got the nuclear codes.
This meme made me sad.
Fuck those Vikings, Jimmy! You go ahead and build that AT-AT.
I’m certain that Jimmy Carter has every reason to be satisfied with the amount he’s built.
There is actually an official clarification from LEGO that the 99 years is definitely not a hard upper limit.
I don’t know whether that’s funny or sad.
No one is getting hard at 99.
Not since Roz passed last year anyway
Sorry Jimmy, it’s Mega for you now
Probably not, cause they’ll make some decent sets and then send then send them to a random Walmart in bumfuck Idaho and nowhere else, unless you want to pay 4x the price on Amazon.
Honestly I think Mattel don’t want to be in the brick business sometimes.
Over a 100 years old, you can do whatever the fuck you want. You’re gonna throw him in jail? He doesn’t even know if he’ll live for another hour.
At least he still has 37 years to play with a Koosh ball
Jeez. Even my dog who loved her Koosh ball was only 98 in dog years when she died. They’re apparently making them for tortoises.
I mean, his are probably hanging so low by now that they make legitimately enjoyable fidget toy.