• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    When your emotions are reduced to ‘rage’ and your reactions reduced to ‘commit violence against inanimate objects in a public setting’, yes.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You have no idea what prompted the emotions, you just happily assume whatever will give you the excuse to express your misandry.

      I’d bet anything that if you read one of the many accounts of women getting genuinely angry at their SOs, even striking them (which is way worse than striking an inanimate object, by the way), based on what they dreamt the guy did, you wouldn’t be blaming her “fragile femininity”.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You have no idea what prompted the emotions, you just happily assume whatever will give you the excuse to express your misandry.

        I’d bet anything that if you read one of the many accounts of women getting genuinely angry at their SOs, even striking them (which is way worse than striking an inanimate object, by the way), based on what they dreamt the guy did, you wouldn’t be blaming her “fragile femininity”.

        Really just immediately do what you accused me of doing, huh.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It suggests that the objection is not made in good faith or on principle, even if one accepted the original accusation as true. “Our True Faith vs. Their Heathen Superstition” energy, lmao.