• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    says the bottom canines

    The bottom what? Bottom canines? So you’re arguing they’re not what they are literally called?

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Still dying to know how the tooth’s name at all indicates anything of its function. Canines are literally omnivores. Most primates use theirs for fighting. So please, if you’re done with the ad hominem I’d love to see you try to defend this here comment.

        • alekwithak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Are you insinuating that having canines makes you an omnivore because we have been over this several times how almost every mammal regardless of diet has flat molars and sharp incisors, and yes even canines. Heck, water deer have turned their canines into long fangs and they still only eating that herb

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It’s almost like there’s different evolutionary factors of how canines are formed. oh my God what the fuck wow, who could have guessed. 😱 I wonder what the human evolutionary factors were. It couldn’t possibly be a lack of food and a evolutionary benefit of eating a much wider diet or anything.

        • alekwithak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          “garbage” ‘gibbering nonsense’

          Are you a conservative by chance? Masterfully sidestepping the question yet again!

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Are you a conservative by chance?

            Was that meant as an ad hominem? I thought you didn’t like those.

            Garbage was a reference to what you were adding to the “discussion”, not you as a person, so doesn’t qualify as ad hominem.

            Same for gibbering nonsense.

            • alekwithak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I ask you questions and you sidestep them over and over and over again and I’m adding garbage to the conversation?

                • alekwithak@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  What, so now I’m not allowed to enjoy arguing with strangers on the Internet? Why don’t you just kill me.

                  My question wasn’t any more disingenuous than the comment it followed. Everything I have said is in good faith. Calling my arguments that you can’t refute garbage is absolutely ad hominem, no matter how diffuse you try to sound. Every comment you’ve made since I pointed that out has been ad hominem tu quoque, or a ‘no, you.’ So while this was fun at the start, unless you have something to say about teeth I’m gonna go talk with the adults. And yes that was ad hominem, suck my whole ass.

                  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Calling my arguments

                    Oh, so you have an argument now?

                    Nobody arguing in good faith says:

                    What’s my argument? I’m listening.

                    If you feel like your argument has been misinterpreted, or that a counter argument is irrelevant, someone who is arguing in good faith would restate their argument to indicate why the counter argument was irrelevant. Not “guess what my argument is” so that they can avoid stating something that would have to actually defend.

                    Every comment you’ve made since I pointed that out has been ad hominem tu quoque, or a ‘no, you.’

                    Your entire post was a “no you”. Pointing out your insincerity and hypocrisy is not a tu quoque, because I’m not trying to convince you of anything. I’m just pointing out your insincerity and hypocrisy.

                    Everything I have said is in good faith

                    Ah yes, that classic markers of someone having a good faith discussion:

                    If you want to feel better about your choices I’m not the one you need to convince.

                    Downvote if you can’t refute!

                    unlike you I have a philosophy of live and let live.

                    (There’s another of your trademark ad hominem attacks!)

                    You keep at it though, I believe in you!

                    Cool, thanks. Very helpful. Loving talking to you, it’s been so constructive.

                    The world is full of things that have nothing to do with you. Instead of getting bent out of shape about it you can just move along. You don’t get the reference? Keep scrolling, it’s not for you.

                    You guys are so funny! Okay so FOUR semi-pointy teeth absolutely makes us omnivores I CANNOT believe what an idiot I’ve been!