• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “In, fire 30% of the workforce, new logo, boom! Out. You are now a fully trained management consultant.”

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Too many people think the world belongs to those who dream, who imagine a better future…

    It does not. It belongs to those who do the work that runs the world

  • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I honestly feel you shouldn’t be able to declare money saved from layoffs as a good thing, shouldn’t profit be a sign of growth but if you really could keep growing you’d still need that staff

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not a good thing if you know what you’re looking at. Of course, the average investor doesn’t have a clue. Half the problem is that there’s a lot that can’t be conveyed in financial statements. I’ve worked for companies that I would never buy any stock in because it’s like you get there and realize that they completely destroyed any chance at long term viability for some small short term gains. Even if they’re profitable. Corporations that focus on building a high quality, sustainable business that aims to earn a modest profit are an exceptionally rare breed.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    All employees are replaceable by a series of sales pitches on what AI is about to do right around the corner. That will keep pumping the stock price right up until the impending massive crash.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    And remember that when they say shareholders, it’s not a large number of people. There are a few people who want to make money pushing for the layoffs, and they know what the consequences are going to be.

  • ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If shareholders and executives are demanding so much money, shouldn’t they be the optimal target for cuts to maximize profitability of the business? 🤔

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh, they still do these…

      I’ve heard some stories where managers had to lay off most of their team, then put the remaining on performance plans, and then when those people were fired, they had no directs and then had to convert to a IC role they were woefully unable to do, transfer (lol good luck), or leave.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    My company 😢

    This shit sucks. Some Silicon Valley shit company bought ours and they’re closing us down after only half a year. Feels so unfair. Our company was doing well while theirs is going down the shitter with huge loans and promising the moon but delivering fuck all. Silicon Valley culture is toxic shit

    • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Typical Private Equity deal… The buyers take a massive loan in the name of the company they are buying then they use the sudden massive interest payments to explain the declining profits and the need to downsize. Then they find a way to squirrel out of the loans claiming the company sucked and let banks take remaining assets (or losses) and maybe resell the intellectual property to someone else right before that.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        So you mean that banks are dumb and give away money for free and then just take the losses and repeat thr process?

        • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Actually banks take collateral that is normally not what the private equity firms target and that actually seems to work, but the consequence is that hard assets of the firm (offices, buildings, hardware, cash, etc) are essentially given up

          • starchylemming@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            so think of your company as a horse

            you sell it to someone for a nice price thinking the other one wants to ride the horse just like you did. but they are actually a butcher and make horse sausage out of it.

      • qevlarr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        True, but we never expected that to happen with our company which was built on entirely different values. I am now committed never to let those vultures anywhere near a company I care about if I can help it, no matter their offer

        • sudo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          My understanding is that these projects are a side-effect of how Google judges promotions. If you’ve “created a new product”, that puts you higher on the list to get promoted.

          There are no incentives nor resources for maintaining those products. So you see a long list of “ideas” from Google that are abandoned immediately after someone got their promotion.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t even know if that list would be a fair one because those are things we know were killed. We don’t know how many unannounced or secret projects were killed that were basically completed.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Well, this is because it’s access to Money that determines power, not actual merit.

      That’s the purest Capitalism you can think of and you see it at such an extreme level in present day Tech Startup Culture because nowadays it’s basically the Even Wilder Wild West Of Finance so it operates by the same principles of Finance - (I actually went from Investment Banking to Startups back in the UK a few years ago and for me it looked a lot like the Founder and Investor level culture of the latter was very similar to that in the wildest bits of the former). Back in the 90s Startups weren’t quite like that, but nowadays it’s different.

      That kind of thing also operates at the people level: I’ve seen Startups with so-so ideas get jump-started with a couple of millions because mommy and daddy of a main founder are rich whilst ideas with a lot better legs to go places keep limping along unable to generate sufficient cash flow to takeoff or to get enough investment to do what’s needed to generate more cash flow, until running out of founds.

      What survives is either those with access to lots of no questions asked money upfront (which actually works because a well funded half-arsed idea can still triumph in the market over barelly funded good ideas) or those who manage to portray their stuff as paradygm-changing (“The next Google!!!”) which why one sees incredible levels of bullshit in the Startup space and endless jumping on hype-trains (like, for example, anybody looking for funding now will be pitching “something-something-AI !!!”)

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Shareholders aren’t the big issue. CEOs paying themselves hundreds of millions of dollars is.

  • lemmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    You certainly won’t have to rehire many of them in a week or two as your operations turn to shit.

  • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hey this has been happening at my work! It definitely isn’t a complete dumpster fire over here now, that knowledge and experience from those hundreds of people wasn’t critical or anything, the people who are left are totally working well and not just scraping by under constant fear of being fired next, it’s fine

    • dexa_scantron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      My company built a big lab with expensive equipment and then laid off the person who was an expert in using all of it.

      • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m sure that won’t have any negative consequence. Please do not question the decisions of our enlightened leaders or you won’t have pizza.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They always underestimate the morale killer. They think HR sending out a few notes will smooth things over. Nope, that job security just hit the floor, people are scared. Productivity drops while everyone processes, people start wondering if they should look elsewhere, it takes years to rebuild from a big layoff like that

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        My employer had a slightly better reason to do layoffs, because our financial situation then was pretty bad and still is pretty bad. I don’t mean “we got 30% profit instead of 31%!”, but “we aren’t making money and we have no money”. Layoffs were more understandable than usual given the situation and circumstances.

        And even in these conditions, I still think it was a terrible decision. Morale was ultra low after the layoffs, and the situation led to quite a few people who did survive to leave of their own volition for better opportunities. We lost talent in the layoffs, and then we lost talent in everyone who felt like they were on a sinking ship. Which, in turn, has led to even more people feeling like it’s a sinking ship with the writing on the wall.

        My management chain is completely gone. I directly report to an executive now, where previously there was my supervisor, his supervisor, his supervisor, and then the executive. Where there were perhaps 10-15 system engineers both in and outside my team, there are now like 3-4 of us thanks to layoffs and departures. And if one of these guys leave, I’m going to find a new job and put in my two weeks once I land one.

        The silver lining is that my job security has never been better, because they’ve created a situation where they literally can’t afford to lose me or my colleagues. We’re all on critical projects, and at the point where a new person just wouldn’t be helpful, because they don’t have the proper time to learn and get caught up before we need these projects finished.

        In short? Layoffs are a terrible decision, even when you’re in terrible financial straits. You risk a death spiral that makes things even worse and worse.

        • MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Dude, just start looking. Don’t wait for somebody else to leave, be that person.

          If somebody else leaves, your workload will increase even more while you try to find a new job. Just take the initiative. And next time, be quicker about it too. Protect yourself.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s a renewable energy company, so I do believe in its mission and I’m hoping it’ll be successful in the long term. I want to jump ship only as a last resort.

            That said, I should probably stop being lazy and actually update my resume and start putting out some applications.

            • MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I symphatize with that, but it would seem they are definitely not going to last until they are successful. I respect that you work towards renewable energy, but they won’t lose one night of sleep if they have to fire you down the road.

              Take care of yourself, good luck.

              Edit: I just remembered from another thread. Somebody shared a gem about hoping: Hope in one hand, shit in the other and see which one gets filled first.

              Not to say hope is bad, but I also believe in being realistic about things.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                No you’ve brought up a lot of good points, and I appreciate it. I also just tend to be resistant to changes as a person. At the very least I do need to brush up my resume.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I always jump ship after a layoff. They invariably ask you to do more work for the same price. Half the time at places I’ve worked the company goes under soon anyways.

        You get a bigger raise with a new job than staying at the old job, and I assume it’s even worse after layoffs. When I tell job interviewers “because layoffs”, they can easily verify it and confirm I didn’t just get fired for being an asshole.

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        What happened at my work was they did like 2 mini layoffs, then a medium one, then a big one that was split into 3 parts, all this over the course of about two years. Morale here is more or less in free fall, we’ve alienated our user base, and I don’t expect it to recover for many years.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          wow, it sounds like they did the exact perfectly wrong approach to layoffs. (When I was laid off I researched how companies do them).

          The goal should be to do one big layoff - once. This sounds horrible, but it actually helps morale in the longrun because you can tell your people you did it once so it doesn’t have to happen again. (Assuming the company is in fact in dire straits). Morale will go to zero, some employees will leave, but it will rebuild, and trust will (eventually) be restored.

          What you don’t want to do is several layoffs, because each succeeding layoff morale drops even lower and more and more people leave voluntarily, and you never rebuild that trust, because there is no reason to. Anxiety that you’ll lose your job keeps growing, fearing that you’ll be next, and you have no idea when. So, you might as well just let everyone go and start over.

          • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah only reason I’m still there is I can’t let my insurance get disrupted right now. Couple more months though then I’m going to start looking around. I don’t trust them at all anymore and I’ve pretty well checked out of that job

      • sevan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        My (soon to be ex) company gets around the rebuild step by doing annual layoffs.

      • bamfic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        they are so clueless. half of my team got laid off on friday, and we got an email from our manager inviting us to attend a different team’s standup in addition to our own so we could feel more “connected”.

        the only thing another standup is going to make me feel is fucking pissed off

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          maybe you just need a pizza party. There they can explain how laying off half your team was a good thing so they can buy another Audi

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I work in an industry where it’s kind of normal to have large fluctuations. Layoffs at least go by seniority, so only new people are terrified.