Useless red circle, I know, but in my defense I didn’t put it there, it was already like this when I found it.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    See back then and for centuries after even: the default mentality for existing was not as zero-sum as it is today.

    Resources and generally speaking: ‘the world’ was seen as expansive and functionally infinite. I.e.: non-zero-sum. One’s acquisition of resources did not inherently detract from another’s resource. Societies would just exile people and consider them dead and gone into the ether.

    So a warlord could easily let some shit like this slide. No fight, free castle.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        We could still have this thinking today.

        The scarcity of resources is largely one of distribution and access: not production or availability. There are more than enough resources. We destroy clothes and food for going unsold. People go homeless and hungry for lack of money or employment, not a lack of shelter or food. Famines are policy decisions.

        Only in the immediacy of natural disaster scenarios where infrastructure itself breaks down are we really faced with the kind of reality where there isn’t wasted excess.

        If you’re interested I suggest an easy but short read: Operation Manual For Spaceship Earth by Buckminster Fuller. It is old as hell but it does a good job of portraying how such a mindset could work for modern civilization.