• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s funny because endocrine-disputing chemicals dumped by humans really are messing frogs up quite badly, but now you can’t bring it up without people getting the wrong idea about your political views…

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I was listening to radio the other week when they were talking about companies dumping chemicals into British rivers. The effects that they were talking about sounded awfully familiar to anyone who has ever heard Alex Jones open his mouth.

      They’re actually putting chemicals in the water that’s turning the frogs gay! (kinda…amongst other things)

      You know you’ve fucked up when you’re making Alex Jones sound sane.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        the thing is , what you’re trying to imply the bad part is.

        “They’re putting chemicals into the water” > this should stop because it’s pollution being done as a cost cutting measure.

        or

        “The frogs are turning gay” > being gay is bad, that’s why we should stop people trying to make things gay on purpouse to stop homosexuality.

        The top one is sensible, the bottom one is psychotic

        • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Nothing wrong with being gay. Gonna have some population problems when everyone’s gay.

          That said, it’d be an interesting novel.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Gonna have some population problems when everyone’s gay.

            right, which is why putting chemicals in the water that turn the frikkin frogs gay is an example of something bad due to pollution.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The short answer is that the pollution is bad, but so is it’s effect of turning the frogs gay because it fucks with frog populations, which fucks with the entire food chain after a fashion.

          Nothing necessarily wrong with homosexuality in any species (except maybe the ones who can only mate once, or the ones that engage in traumatic insemination where the males aren’t as equipped to deal with being on the receiving end), until it’s frequent enough to have population level impacts.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            it’s bad for the frog population to turn them all gay?

            right, which is why putting chemicals in the water that turn the frikkin frogs gay is an example of something bad due to pollution.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        But that’s how Alex Jones scam works, he read the frogs gay headline and then started ranting about how the global elite are trying to destroy masculinity with hormones in the water because only real men vote right…

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sure, but “THEY’RE PUTTING CHEMICALS IN THE WATER THAT TURN THE FROGS GAY!!!” is the classic example used for Alex Jones sounding especially out there. To the point that there’s a clip of just that line that’s made the rounds for most of a decade to point out how crazy he is. Which makes it especially wild because it’s one of the things he’s said that’s actually true.