• therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If there was an artifact that was meant to go to a museum id rather have it go to one where the most people can see and enjoy a piece of my areas history rather than set it up in a case in a third world country shack

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      well maybe that historical piece would be a great benefit to the economy of that third world nation and they could grow and thrive and not be third world country anymore

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I doubt that. But it should still be that country’s choice as to where to display their artifact. The person above you is making sense in general but missing the point in this context.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well lemmy knows best I have you know that lemmy last week told me that they only reason anyone goes to Thailand is for hookers. When I pointed out all the amazing historical stuff to see there, and included pictures of some of it, the group mind insisted that I was wrong and they knew the truth.