• misspacific@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    well, not quite, but you have the gist.

    nicotine patches and gum have been around for quite awhile, and the blood vessel constriction is a fact, and therefore, it will affect skin/hair health.

    it’s just to what degree. clearly, it’s more than analog cigarettes where you’re sucking on literal smoke.

    • Instigate@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      it’s more than analog cigarettes

      I assume you mean less and yeah, that would make sense on the face of it. It just seems as though there’s no empirical evidence that nicotine specifically causes skin damage - only evidence that it causes blood vessel constriction. Do you have a source that shows a causal relationship from constricting blood vessels to poor skin health? That again would make sense to me, but I just don’t like to base my positions on assumptions - I’m a raw data sort of person.

      There’s definitely no world where nicotine is harmless - it causes very clear harms beyond simple addiction that we’ve known for some time - but it’s important to be accurate around how much safer nicotine is in its other forms, particularly as you mentioned that it’s a necessary medicinal quit-smoking aid compound.

      If vaping nicotine is the equivalent of five minutes of sun exposure per day without sunscreen, that’s a tolerable risk. If it causes anywhere near 50% of the damage that cigarettes cause, that’s a serious issue.